Opinion Polls: Do you think a two party system is nesecary in modern democracy?

Question

Yes or no... and why. Thank you : )

Answer 1

Absolutely. There MUST be a debate between the "ins" and the "outs" (those IN power versus those OUT of power.) It is the job of the INS to get away with as much monkey business as possible and it is the job of the OUTS to act as the watchdogs of the INS. EVERY political party tries to get away with monkey business. EVERYONE. Of course there can be lesser parties but their impact is often to act as a spoiler for the two major parties (eg. 1912, 1948, 1968, 2000 elections)

Answer 2

No, I just think that the mentality of Us vs Them has been so forced into peoples mind that, that is all they can comprehend for the last couple generations. I actually believe that in a modern democracy a mutli party system would be more effective because it would give those people that aren't out on the ends of the spectum a better choice. The United States has a two party system and if one thing is not completely apparent, is that both Democrats and Republicans are completely worthless, and I just wish I had different choice somewhere in the middle. You know, like a CommonSense party, I'd vote for that party, if it ever existed.

Answer 3

No, assuming people actually know how to count past two.

Many people argue that we already have a one-party system, just with two wings that like to snipe at each other. Nothing unites the Republicans and the Democrats like a real challenge from a third party or independent; many states have elections laws that are specifically designed to keep these 'outsiders' out.

For true representation, we need fair and equal ballot access laws and acceptance voting. But both the Republicans and Democrats acknowledge that only having half, or even slightly less than half, of a pork trough is better than having to share it with more parties, so they'll never let it happen.

Answer 4

Do you know why attempts at "democracy" have been such miserable failures in other parts of the world? Because in places like Iran, you'll have 80 candidates running for the same office. You get dozens and dozens of single-issue candidates who just polarize the voters.

The two party system forces serious compromise.

I believe in the two party system. I just wish there was a way for a viable third party candidate to give serious competition to both the Republicans and Democrats. The last serious third party candidate was Teddy Roosevelt, who ran for re-election on an independent ticket.

Both parties need a little kick in the butt.

Answer 5

2? should be a minimum of 4 but then the power would be divided and the politicians wouldn't like that. Thats one thing the dems and rep will always agree on. If an Independent canidate won the white house the 2 other parties would ban together to crush him. Sad but true. I wish there was a way out of our perdicament here. Any suggestions?

Answer 6

definite that's a kind of democracy, the overall public comes to a decision, yet no longer the most appropriate type. If I had my way, we will be utilising 4 votes each and each at each election: celebration A OR B; B OR C; A OR C; maximum appropriate different. And on the subsequent election, the most appropriate different winner replaces the worst appearing of the three as a significant candidate. you've not appeared at interior reach nor nationwide election outcomes in case you think the Lib Dems do not get an significant percentage of the votes in the united kingdom at presnt (in reality in a tiny minority of constituencies do they nevertheless get lower than 20% of the vote)! and that i welcome the convergence, I see it as a realisation procedure from all activities that in reality certain ideas, proposals and concepts are politically, economically, and around the international conceivable - the important activities could be similar at the same time as in authorities, as they couldn't have sufficient money to brush aside the straightforward instructions of heritage - and too drastic replace at the same time as a sparkling celebration is provided in finally ends up in a lot of years of progression being esponged away. I in reality desire it replaced into less demanding to perceive the alterations of their song archives and of their proposals, come election time, with out having to position self belief in the BBC or take Rupert Murdock's be conscious for it (and that my above idea features a lot of help).

Answer 7

Only an American would think two parties are too many in their fake democracy. Other places where it's one party rule: Russia, the Soviet Union, communist China, Mexico, and numerous other dictatorships.

Real democracies have five or more parties.

Answer 8

Yes, necessary to keep out the other parties

Answer 9

Yes and maybe more for reason listed in the websites I've listed below:

www.c-a-t-c-h.ca/
www.raven1.net
yahoo group "cause stalking"
www.mindcontrolforum.com

Answer 10

nope, need more choices, I am not to fond of either party right now, but what other choice do I have but to vote for one of them, or some 3ed party that is a joke.