English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Professor Antony Flew, a prominent British philosopher, athiest author of Darwinian Evolution, has now cited advancements in science as proof of the existence of God. He said Naturalism failed to answer the Origin of species.

2006-06-16 13:52:10 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

If a person insists not following the evidences. He is willfully blind, deserving the horrible pit of burning fire.

2006-06-16 14:55:44 · update #1

Natural science has compelling evidences for the existence of God. MIT physicist Vera Kistiankowsky said: This exquisite order displayed by our scientific understanding of the physical world calls for the divine.

2006-06-17 04:46:23 · update #2

7 answers

Antony Flew said:

"I remain still what I have been now for over fifty years, a negative atheist. By this I mean that I construe the initial letter in the word 'atheist' in the way in which everyone construes the same initial letter in such words as 'atypical' and 'amoral'. For I still believe that it is impossible either to verify or to falsify - to show to be false - what David Hume in his Dialogues concerning Natural Religion happily described as "the religious hypothesis." The more I contemplate the eschatological teachings of Christianity and Islam the more I wish I could demonstrate their falsity.

I can suggest only one possible source of the rumours. Several weeks ago I submitted to the Editor of Philo (The Journal of the Society of Humanist Philosophers) a short paper making two points which might well disturb atheists of the more positive kind. The point more relevant here was that it can be entirely rational for believers and negative atheists to respond in quite different ways to the same scientific developments. ...I recognize that developments in physics coming on the last twenty or thirty years can reasonably be seen as in some degree confirmatory of a previously faith-based belief in god, even though they still provide no sufficient reason for unbelievers to change their minds. They certainly have not persuaded me. "

2006-06-23 06:06:34 · answer #1 · answered by Rodrigo O 5 · 1 1

I've never heard of Antony Flew. Bertrand Russell is probably the best-known and most respected contemporary British philosopher. Read some of his work on the subject.

2006-06-16 14:00:18 · answer #2 · answered by Tim 6 · 2 0

he isn't any longer in the early ranges of Alzheimer's as has been reported elsewhere the following, he actual died in April from subject matters linked with Alzheimer's ailment, that isn't any longer available no longer link his ailment consisting of his later wondering on the remember of "god" because no new evidence has come to gentle, and Flew brushed off the god concept at the same time as he replaced into on the properly of his psychological powers, theists starved of psychological credibility pounced in this at a loss for words guy in his ninth decade to grant them some credence, that is shameful. The e book you aspect out replaced into "co" written through Roy Varghese who fairly of route has an time table, why would not Flew have used a ghost author with out an time table? that is like writing a e book on the prospect of Xenu (Xemu) contemporary and having Tom Cruise as your ghost author

2016-10-31 00:38:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

My best friend recently converted to Judaism. Why do all the other Christians hold out?

I am not that man. I believe what I believe, not what he believes. Move on.

2006-06-16 13:57:00 · answer #4 · answered by Not Allie 6 · 1 0

We are not "holding out." I, at least, found my athiest believes threw personal discovery. You would be suprised what could happen if you open your mind and examine the world around you.

2006-06-16 13:56:40 · answer #5 · answered by Fool on the Hill 4 · 1 1

We will have to continue to pray for them and hope they find the right path in time. God bless you!!

2006-06-16 13:56:55 · answer #6 · answered by altruistic 6 · 2 2

Because we are NOT HIM. Why don't all christians, catholics, jews, muslims believe in buddha? Come on!!!!

2006-06-16 13:55:38 · answer #7 · answered by teachingazteca 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers