English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I must admit his story was really exciting, but the more you read about what experts say, the more I'm disappointed.

His story aside, have you ever read about the guy's true background?
Here:
http://www.ufo.se/ufofiles/english/issue_2/uklazr-2.html

Tell me if you can trust such a guy (some might even interpret his wife's suicide as possible murder!).

That is not to say that we should not suspect what's going on behind Area 51 though...

2006-06-16 13:49:34 · 4 answers · asked by C1N2G8 1 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

4 answers

Ive watched this area 51 ordeal since I was fresh out of high school and have had my doubts but I DO know that the government originally denied Lazar ever worked at area 51 only to find out later when the "Right to Know" act was passed that documents proving Lazar worked at area 51 did come up. Simply put the government was lying. I also know that ununpentium or element 115 has been created but its shelf life is too short to make it practical. Scientists are still working on finding the plateau where it becomes stable. Why is 115 even shown in the periodic table as a possible element in the first place if there isnt some truth here? More documents have recently been released proving that a military general was involved in creating the reverse engineering of the so called flying saucer at area 51. The general is now retired and has since written a book on the subject and clearly states that the area 51 flying saucer was real. He also states that the aliens arent really aliens but humans from the future! Plot thickens! I would also like to ad from my own observations, why did our military all of a sudden release the stealth aircraft to the public and have sold some of the planes to other countries? We learned once not to let our pants down and have since become one of the sneakiest and ruthless countries in the world when it comes to warfare. I am just wondering what our military has replaced these flying weapons with.....one more item needs to be brought to attention....John Glenns sighting in his first orbital flight saw what appeared to be an object traveling at greater than 25000 mph and then suddenly making a right angle turn which isnt a naturally occuring event is true. The actual footage is real! He caught it on film.

2006-06-16 15:09:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I agree, his story should not be completely dismissed. Anyone who can build his own particle accelerator from scratch to refine his own hydrogen fuel, can't be a complete crack pot. See . article 1 below, to read about what Lazar is doing today.

Is there a way to prove any part of his story? Maybe. In 1989, Lazar claimed the ET saucers he worked on could produce their own gravity. This propulsion was made possible by a super heavy substance Lazar called Element 115. What is the problem with this story? Element 115 did not exist in 1989. Now, however, it does.

Earlier this year, British scientists say they demonstrated an anti-gravity system that appears to be based on the theories revealed years ago by Lazar. Some scientists say it's proof that what Lazar said about Element 115 is true after all.

In the wake of these new developments, I would have to say, yes, there appears to be some truth to what Lazar saw.

Remember, back in 1947, in Roswell, New Mexico: there were reports of a crash with eye witness accounts saying they saw a saucer and a small humanoid creature. The Items were said to have been recovered by the U.S. Government. See article 2 below.

As for recent rumors of them being time travelers: Using an atomic clock, on a fast rocket, the U.S. government has proved time travel is possible given a fast enough ship. This also backed up Einstein's Relativity theory. See article 3 below.

Not enough: See article 4, for more on the subject.

2006-06-16 13:51:42 · answer #2 · answered by Joe_Pardy 5 · 0 0

No! I think Lazar is as full of s**t as a Christmas goose.

2006-06-16 13:54:43 · answer #3 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 0 0

no

2006-06-16 14:09:23 · answer #4 · answered by hkyboy96 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers