Trousers (pants) also trace their ancestry to the individual hose worn by men in the 15th century (which is why trousers are plural and not singular). The hose were easy to make and fastened to a doublet at the top with ties called "points", but as time went by, the two hose were joined, first in the back then across the front, but still leaving a large opening for sanitary functions. Originally, doublets came almost to the knees, effectively covering the genitalia, but as fashions changed and doublets became shorter, it became necessary (and required by the church) for men to cover their genitals with a codpiece.
2006-06-16 12:42:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eli 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
that dosnt make any sense a pair of glove yes there are two peices pants are one piece thats like calling a single person a couple
2006-06-16 19:44:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by puresplprix 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the same reason we have the tooth brush instead of the teeth brush and other things like that.
English sucks!
2006-06-16 19:40:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
because there is two pants legs, that come in a pair.
2006-06-16 19:40:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by tadah.yess 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because there are two legs i guess i don't know! LOL (i've always wondered that too!0
2006-06-16 21:11:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Two legs. Also, this applies to the gloves too.
2006-06-16 19:38:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kat 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats a good question I think its too late to change it now.
2006-06-16 19:44:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mela L 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I always wonder the same thing.
2006-06-16 19:40:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL good question
2006-06-16 19:39:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
w/e
2006-06-16 19:39:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋