English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-16 12:08:54 · 19 answers · asked by SHut YO Big HeAd Up 2 in Sports Basketball

19 answers

No.. Its was a bad call by Jerry Buss, he panicked when they failed to win a championship 2 yrs in a row evn by acquiring Malone and Payton,thinking Shaq and Kobes 3peat might rot , he chose to make the lakers self destruct..Thus sendng shaq to the heat and rebuilding around kobe.. But putting a Brown experiment and a soft girl like Odom alongside Kobe will never do.

The result? lakers are now just another NBA team..

2006-06-16 14:35:01 · answer #1 · answered by BLACKPOPE 2 · 1 3

No. Because when Shaq was in LA with Kobe, the ESPN propaganda machine dictated that LA should beat Sacramento even when Sacramento was a better team just like they are doing now with Miami over Dallas.

But maybe Kobe will come to peace with the ESPN propaganda machine and be chosen back into the "elite" club that receives preferential treatment and LA will return to winning again!

2006-06-16 19:54:52 · answer #2 · answered by The Flashman 4 · 0 0

No. Shaq may not score the most points on Heat team but I don't think they would have gotten as far as they have w/o him. Most might think Dwyane would have gotten his team there even if Shaq wasn't on the team, but Dwyane is only one person and it takes a team to win. Don't get me wrong I'm not hatin' on Dwyane b/c that's my favorite NBA player, but the Heat also need SHAQ!!!

2006-06-16 19:34:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. Shaq was the real number 1 man in LA. No matter how Kobe spun it off.

2006-06-16 19:10:12 · answer #4 · answered by Legend 3 · 0 0

No, it was definately not a good idea to trade Shaq, they need him to win another championship

2006-06-17 20:17:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No without shaq their useless they need a big guy down low.

2006-06-16 19:13:12 · answer #6 · answered by Pekkle 2 · 0 0

I suppose not. Kobe and Shaq could no longer co-exist though. One of them had to go or neither of them would play.

2006-06-16 19:15:23 · answer #7 · answered by jjc92787 6 · 0 0

No if Shaq stayed they would have won more championships.

2006-06-16 19:36:06 · answer #8 · answered by G-man 4 · 0 0

noooo they need shaq shaq and kobe ?

2006-06-16 19:10:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no they should have kepted shaq

2006-06-16 20:36:13 · answer #10 · answered by melody g 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers