Should the United States set up a fixed date for the removal of troops from Iraq?

Question

Please give your best and most convincing arguments for or against this issue.

Answer 1

No, there should be no cast-in-concrete definite date. The reason is not because US troops should be removed from Iraq, because they should be, but because giving a definite date will work to the advantage of insurgents who can then plan accordingly. As long as the insurgents are kept second guessing the US intentions they will be off balance and will not be able to formulate definitve actions based on that information.

What would probably work far better is a gradual drawdown of so many thousands a month or whatever, with the option to send them right back if any massive insurgent attacks occur. By gradually pulling troops out, there will be no definite date that would mark a boundary between "troops there" and "troops not there". It's sort of the reverse of putting the frog in the pot of cold water and gradually turning up the heat; the water begins to get warm so gradually that the frog doesn't notice it and before he knows it he is boiled to death. A gradual drawdown of troops would be much the same only in reverse. As US troops gradually leave, the power shift to Iraqi soldiers would be hardly noticable until one day they all come to the realization that all the US troops had left months ago.

Answer 2

Yes, a lot of people would argue that we shouldn't quit until the job is done. The problem is, how do you define when the job is done. Irag already has their interim government setup. We're never going to remove every last insurgent, because they are breeding faster than we can take them out (and they are coming from all over the world and converging on Iraq)

G. Bush proclaimed mission Accomplished almost 3 years ago yet we are not seeing any significant troop withdrawels. So at least in the president's eyes, our mission is complete, so bring the troops home.

Answer 3

would I recommend that you ask the mothers and fathers of a few of those little ones somewhat of having those who've no personal adventure giving their 2 cents.... My son replaced into 3 months previous at the same time as my husband left and replaced into 15 months at the same time as he lower back. He took some weeks to "get used" to my husband....and interior some months you would have never huge-spread that they had hung out aside. more often than not from chatting with females with older little ones it quite varies depending on the baby's age....small little ones particularly a lot have a short readjsutment time and welcome daddy domicile with open hands. little ones have a tendency to take the time to readjust to the 2d authority ascertain in the domicile. in case you quite choose a correct answer to this, yahoo has some help goups from armed forces spouses....attempt asking this question to a form of communities. P.S. i don't think of any baby is merely "used to it" at the same time as their figure is deployed. And declaring that exhibits you may no longer understand any lively accountability households who've lengthy handed by this. Do you quite believe that preparation excersises that very last 2 weeks to a month prepares a baby for his/her figure being lengthy gone for a 12 months is an quite conflict zone? And to say my son is at risk to be a terrorist because my husband is a patriot? the position do you human beings arise with this crap?

Answer 4

I think we should let the liberals win that one.
Sure, let's set up a date so then the terrorists know when to take that country back into control; the day after the published date.

Answer 5

Let's see, if I were fighting a war and the group I was fighting said it was going to quit the war on a certain day, what would I do? Maybe lay low until they were gone and then start up again? Easy victory if there is no opponent.

Answer 6

No we should not make a fixed date, make the dumb sob's wonder/ they started the Hysteria now we have got to finish it the right way I think the United Nation's need's to step in here pretty soon hu????

Answer 7

Yes they should Iraq has to be on their own we have done our part send our soldiers home Iraq has to be more depended on the their own military

Answer 8

it will never happen - us troops will be in Iraq permanently most likely.

Answer 9

If they did that, wouldn't the terrorists just sit back and wait for the U.S. to leave, then launch their offensives?

Answer 10

NO, setting a timetable allows the enemy to organize their own.