She won't run! because she won't win!
at this time, she will not get my vote.
A strong woman President is a good idea, but it will not happen any time soon. Women don't vote for women, they don't trust each others.
2006-06-16 10:04:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Diamond 4
·
8⤊
0⤋
I really hope not. I don't like her policies in general, but also, she is a JUNIOR senator from New York, and the only reason she had that job was because of the name recognition from her husband. She's a smart woman in her own right, but she doesn't have nearly enough experience to lead the country. Which is good because I really don't want her to!!!!
Another thing, I'm a woman and I don't really care if we have a woman president! If there's one that's the most qualified candidate I'd vote for her, but in general I don't think it's that big a deal. I don't think a woman would be better or worse at being president than a man.
I would probably vote for Condi Rice though...
2006-06-16 10:00:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous61245 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope she does not run.
Reason:
She is such a polarizing figure that she will drive a significant number of undecideds into the GOP column. And the last thing we need is another 4 or 8 years of this Republican Party in office only because some voters voted against Hillary..
I hope the Dems pick someone that will appeal to the moderates instead of forcing them to make such an unpleasant choice.
2006-06-16 10:03:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by killintimer 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Hilary became President,I fill that she would make the changes in society,that men were afraid to or could'nt accomplish. She would definetly stop these illegal aliens from entering the USA,and there would probably be no more wars. Because she is a strong,and dedicated woman,she would probably scare the hell out of any man,who would try to question her motives.
2006-06-16 10:00:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Squeakers 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary Clinton is all for an extended American stay in Iraq. She “takes responsibility” for her vote on the war, but won’t admit that it was wrong. And of course, Clinton is still for “winning” this war. Whatever that means.
2006-06-16 10:00:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wasn't she president before? I don't think the USA needs the Clinton's in the White House again. They treated it like Peyton Place before. Let's not go through that again.
2006-06-16 10:01:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gidget 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't think a female shoud be president reason is we have pms,menopause, and to be honest we can be moody at times and another thing we worry about our looks not sure Hillary does
2006-06-16 10:21:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by ladyoh 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary is unelectable. The first woman President will be Condalezza rice.
2006-06-16 09:58:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree that it is time for a woman president, but not Hillary. She is too polarizing.
Condi Rice would be a far better choice.
2006-06-16 09:58:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mr. October 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Al Gore might actually run. And if she runs, I'd have to hear her views before I made a descision.
2006-06-16 09:59:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by alex_s_patrick 2
·
0⤊
0⤋