English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-16 07:07:10 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Earth Sciences & Geology

Could you give some Internet addresses that could go into further detail to support your answer? Thanks.

2006-06-16 08:56:13 · update #1

11 answers

In the case of the meteorite, it completely depends on the size, but even a large one would vaporize more ice than it would melt, so I would expect the sea level to rise only slightly.

2006-06-16 10:38:51 · answer #1 · answered by Brent 2 · 4 5

We would probably die from the dust clouds and tsunamis well before the Ice would melt in the event that a meteorite hit. Scientists recently discovered a 300 mile crater in Antarctica that once wiped out the majority of life on Earth, well before the Yucatan Peninsula strike that killed the Dinosaurs.

2006-06-16 07:12:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A nuclear weapon, no. The 'biggest' warheads ever fielded would each yield thousands of times less energy than needed to melt a significant amount of the ice-cap.

As for impact events, very large impacts, such as the one which occured at the K-T boundary would certainly liberate enough energy to melt a significant amount of the ice cap - but what fraction of that would actually go into melting ice?

It would certainly vaporize many cubic kilometers of ice and rock, generating an incandescent plume of water vapor and other substances, but that process, along with the shock-wave that the impact would send into the planet itself, would likely account for much of the impact energy.

I would not expect much of the ice affected to simply melt.

The water vapor deposited in the troposphere would eventually fall as precipitation.

Short answer? Probably not.

2006-06-16 09:22:11 · answer #3 · answered by Ethan 3 · 0 0

No. An atomic bomb is like an itch on your back. It's so small compared to the continent. A meteorite also most likely wouldn't melt the whole continent on impact, and you'd need to worry about the amount of dust kicked into the atmosphere.

2006-06-16 07:16:13 · answer #4 · answered by Klaus von Bratwurst 1 · 0 0

Chocolate Ice Cream

2016-05-19 21:18:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, but its not just the coasts which shall be affected, destruction of Antarctica will mean havoc for the entire planet.

2006-06-16 07:10:38 · answer #6 · answered by ag_iitkgp 7 · 0 0

Big enough explosion to melt the ice (or anyway lots of the ice) would also set fire to the atmosphere. Bye bye to us all. The tidal waves would just put out the fires.

2006-06-16 09:02:20 · answer #7 · answered by campojoe 4 · 0 0

If it hit Artica it might, but i doubt that it would flood the coast... like how many nuclear bombs would you need to do that?

2006-06-16 07:11:19 · answer #8 · answered by dangerous E 2 · 0 0

yeah itd be like the day after tomorow

2006-06-16 07:10:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes. But let's just pray it doesn't happen.

2006-06-16 07:19:15 · answer #10 · answered by jrodh8 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers