2006-06-16 05:13:05 · 8 answers · asked by eewill 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Other - Visual Arts
I would model for a drawing or painting, but most likely not for a photographer, unless I knew them/their artwork very well. So often "photographic modeling" translates into amateur porn. Not so with painting and drawing.
2006-06-16 14:58:40 · answer #1 · answered by Oracle at Delphi 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Im not terribly comfortable with the way my body looks so I dont think I could ever model for artistic nudes. But, if somehow I got up the courage for that I think I would perfer to be drawn rather than photographed.
2006-06-16 05:17:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I modeled for a figure drawing class that used charcoals and would have enjoyed it except for one of the students moaning through out the class. So what is most important to me is how respectful the artist is.
2006-06-16 05:18:19 · answer #3 · answered by tarap_mcw 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It wouldn't bother me as long as i felt comfortable with the artist(s). Pencil would be more interesting as i'd like to see people's interpretations.
2006-06-16 06:09:58 · answer #4 · answered by charleymac 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither... i cant imagine being nude in front of total strangers that seems to "lick" their lustful eyes all over my naked body... yucks.
but for art? who says art has gotta be nude to be beautiful? beats me...
2006-06-16 05:17:49 · answer #5 · answered by cynewulve 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure.... anything goes as long as it is for art ; )
2006-06-17 04:41:18 · answer #6 · answered by Spacey~Stacey's Place 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
either or. each of them captures something different.
2006-06-16 05:16:41 · answer #7 · answered by Kismet 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i would not fell confortable
2006-06-16 05:20:31 · answer #8 · answered by amani 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋