I believe that he jumped on the defenders shoulders!
2006-06-16 00:54:37 · 13 answers · asked by grooooover 1 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
Yes I believe it was a foul he literally pull the man back , Trinidad couldn't even touch the Queen's Girls or else the bias referee will say it's a foul while they can do what the F@%K they want. Trinidad and Tobago you played well we didn't get them this time but we will be back, asta la vista baby!!
2006-06-16 02:32:59 · answer #1 · answered by keke 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
you've thoroughly misinterpreted 2 Timothy 3:16-17. Nowhere in those verses does it say that the Bible is the *in undemanding words* technique of formulating doctrine, yet it really is the way you and many different Protestants pick to study it. in element of actuality, "Sola Scriptura" is unscriptural, itself. Paul speaks of clinging to the traditions that were surpassed down: 2 Thessalonians 2:15 therefore, brethren, stand quick, and carry the traditions which ye were taught, even if through note, or our epistle. And your very last remark makes it sparkling that no remember what a Catholic tells you about the Scriptural beginning for our doctrinal beliefs, you need to reject it. even at the same time as Scripture is talked about, you'll weasel out of agreeing with a Catholic because that is "assuming" an interpretation. it really is a classic Baptist/fundamentalist/evangelical handle "Heads I win and tails you Catholics lose" if ever I noted one. in case you pick to worship the Bible as a substitute of God, it really is your precise and privilege. yet your assumption that you on my own are maximum recommendations-blowing labels you as both self-righteous and conceited -- 2 characteristics that God hates. And that, my pricey, *is* almost easily Scriptural: Proverbs 30:12-13 there's a era that are organic of their own eyes, and yet isn't washed from their filthiness. there's a era, O how lofty are their eyes! and their eyelids are lifted up. Proverbs 8:13 the phobia of the LORD is to hate evil: delight, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate.
2016-11-14 20:37:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's only a foul when the referees say it's a foul. The game's over, the goal's allowed, so it is not a foul.
2006-06-16 02:00:04 · answer #3 · answered by qwerty 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO WAY it was a foul - you should see Japan's only goal against Mark Schwarzer - now that was a clearcut penalty not given. Check out Gus feelings on this.
2006-06-16 01:02:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No - that kind of contact occurs ALL the time in football: and normally in the defender's favour. It was good to see it was allowed because Crouch has been unfairly been penalised in aerial challenges (seemingly for being TOO TALL lol).
2006-06-16 01:28:40 · answer #5 · answered by the_dt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, i don't think it was a foul. i have seen a number goals scored like this (taking support of opponent's shoulders).
2006-06-16 01:09:47 · answer #6 · answered by aditya 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it was not a foul! It was a legitimate scoring, not even the defender complained!
2006-06-16 01:07:27 · answer #7 · answered by soubassakis 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there was a lot of pulling and tugging and watching the replays i think it was a foul crouch apparently wanted to climb on top of brent sancho's head
2006-06-16 01:45:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Not every contac is a foul.
2006-06-16 01:01:02 · answer #9 · answered by elgil 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No and the referee and his assistants agree with me!
2006-06-16 01:02:01 · answer #10 · answered by natsubee 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋