2006-06-15 22:52:52 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
terrorism is a word was called by the west for all what is against america and what america and israel wanna do. so it is so hard thesedays to distinguish between who fights for freedom and who has the hobby of killing people!!
let me ask u a question now myself... if u were sitting peacefully in ur house and suddenly a stranger jumped from the window and tried to kick u out of ur house, the house that u love all ur life, so as a corresponding action u brought a gun and killed him or injured him to defence ur house and urself, who is the terrorist?? u or the stranger?
2006-06-15 23:02:37 · answer #1 · answered by minx 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A freedom fighter, fights with a noble cause and doesn't harm at least their own country man in order to fight against the foreigner dominance. But a terrorist uses violence and terror to without any specific reason to disturb peace and harmony of their own people and country. Terrorist has no specific purpose but create havoc and terror wherever and whenever they find opportunity to do so. But a freedom fighter do have a sense and a cause before using the violence as a means specifically.
2006-06-15 23:22:24 · answer #2 · answered by Ravi A 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Truly, the use of either word merely indicates the speaker's perspective. Every combatant has used one or another element of terror in its effort to win a war or battle. Following the single actual rule of war: win. The real question should be; "what is the final objective of the combatant?" Put pictures of a WWII GI and an SS fighter side by side and you will note far more similarities than differences. This does not mean they are the same. You must ask yourself; what will occur should this particular combatant win.
2006-06-15 23:10:40 · answer #3 · answered by montecalvo 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Terrorists are following illegal ways, they have nothing to do with innocent nationals and they creat fear and insecure status, they go on fighting against own country,they never accept solution,bad elements in country are attracted in terrorist actions whereas freedom fighters are fighting against foreign domination,after their purpose is served, they join the govt. in developments,generally they follow the practises which don't affect innocent nationals badly. They are good natured persons.
2006-06-15 23:41:53 · answer #4 · answered by dharap123 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
straight forward. at the same time as they are struggling with for the liberty of their human beings which many idea the Afghans doing in Afghanistan yet having gained the country, they grew to develop into the country right into a genocidal penal complex camp a lot worse the Russian puppet regime ever replaced into. They went from freedom wrestle to terrorist. also, freedom warring parties wrestle they do no longer kill females and little ones and desire to win by ability of horror. the yankee revolution replaced into no longer about killing the households of human beings, they were about pushing the British out of the colonies. Clearlyfreedom warring parties can inflict damage on present day armies yet terrorists choose somewhat to explode college buses and women in the marketplace to purchase nutrition for his or her fafamilies you do not see that and performance come to settle for that killing of noncombatants is okay and in reality you want to make it look noble and courageous. Seven 12 months previous little ones on college buses are not any more a lot of a probability on your "terrorist/freedom fighter" and adult men on their thanks to their jobs are not any more armed so that they are straight forward objectives. Thats the large difference. once you're saying jap us of a you recommend Boston and the Irish community, thats no longer united statesa. or individuals those are those who're merely hiding out elsewhere cuz its secure. no human being ever said as the Viet Cong terrorists, they werefightingg of their usa adverse to a overseas military. Blowing up workplace homes or lodges and targeted on unarmed those who've no certain dedication to at least some thing is merely cowardly habit.
2016-10-14 05:22:44 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perspective - One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
2006-06-15 22:56:32 · answer #6 · answered by RAllen1st 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When america bombs hiroshima and nagasaki killing civilian population and flora and fauna as well it is fighiting for freedom...
If Americans occupy veitnam, iraq or afghanistan those who resist them are terrrorists!
It depends on who s doing the talking....
Actually those who r oppressed can be freedom fighters if they retain their sense of judgement or their suffering can be used by creatures like Osama for his own foul agenda involving harm to their own kind... in essence all power mongers r the same... and those who expose them r true lovers of freedom though they may or may not take to arms.
2006-06-16 00:27:42 · answer #7 · answered by boogie man 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on your perspective:
Conservative-Terrorist
Liberal-Freedom Fighter
2006-06-16 02:55:49 · answer #8 · answered by Whitey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A terrorist is one who kills noncombatants on purpose in order to terrorize people.
A freedom fighter only targets military personnel who are oppressing them.
2006-06-15 23:10:30 · answer #9 · answered by askthepizzaguy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
freedom fighters do have sense about how they're gonna go about their work but terrorists do what they do with pure aggression without stopping to think about how their actions will affect innocent ppl....freedom fighters think about it and their motives are pure
2006-06-15 23:00:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋