2006-06-15 22:33:13 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
LACK OF BOWLING.
RAIN IS NOT THE PRIME FACTOR.
2006-06-17 20:28:57 · answer #1 · answered by A.R.RAJA 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
SAURAV GANGULY missing
missed him as a captain in both tests.
tell me honestly-have u ever seen matches gone out of the hand wen they were so close during ganguly`s captaincy? no never seen. rahul dravid has been unable 2 match the captaincy its just hard luck that the 4 th day was called of because of rain. or india would have surely won and then west indies had just one day to survive because of which they could save the second test match. in the first one i feel india should have won its probobly an inexperince bowling attack which couldnt get the last wicket
missing Sachin
well for the first test i have to agree with manish_fame. we needed another bowler to take wickets in 1 day..
But we really really should have won the second test match, really, we could have done it comfortably if it had not rained on the 4th day;
LACK OF BOWLING.
RAIN IS NOT THE PRIME FACTOR.
Open questions in Cricket
Which international team is a non test playing nation and why?
why do people not enjoy cricket as much as football?
What is Zimbabwe's current ICC ranking?
Why arent all West Indian cricketers not on contract basis?
Resolved questions in Cricket
HOW TO STUDY SIX HOURS IN A DAY?(CLASs11 +ENTRANCE PREP.)?
Can we see the match WI vs IND(cric) in the net if so pls tell the website pls.?
Who is the best spinner right from the starting of cricket?
Who is the first Indian test wicketkeeper to score century abroad?
standards of saurav. the matches that india hav won under dravid hav mostly been bcoz of good battin or bowlin and seldom due 2 good captaincy. matches were won with good captaincy in the ganguly days.
2006-06-20 01:19:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We do not have dependable bowlers, we are not sure that we can get 20 wickets in 2/3 days without which we can't win a Test Match.
2006-06-15 22:40:24 · answer #3 · answered by nicefriend 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its just hard luck that the 4 th day was called of because of rain. or india would have surely won and then west indies had just one day to survive because of which they could save the second test match. in the first one i feel india should have won its probobly an inexperince bowling attack which couldnt get the last wicket
2006-06-16 01:27:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
SAURAV GANGULY missing
missed him as a captain in both tests.
tell me honestly-have u ever seen matches gone out of the hand wen they were so close during ganguly`s captaincy? no never seen. rahul dravid has been unable 2 match the captaincy standards of saurav. the matches that india hav won under dravid hav mostly been bcoz of good battin or bowlin and seldom due 2 good captaincy. matches were won with good captaincy in the ganguly days.
2006-06-16 01:12:14 · answer #5 · answered by rangdebas 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well for the first test i have to agree with manish_fame. we needed another bowler to take wickets in 1 day..
But we really really should have won the second test match, really, we could have done it comfortably if it had not rained on the 4th day;
2006-06-16 21:52:18 · answer #6 · answered by emii_dan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
missing Sachin
2006-06-16 01:52:44 · answer #7 · answered by n/a 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
5th bowler missin...
2006-06-15 22:38:12 · answer #8 · answered by manish_fame 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋