whats a straw man?

Question

its a politica word i think.

Answer 1

It depends on the context. Here, you have gotten the legal definitions.

Now, I'm going to tell you about how your name, written in all-capital letters, is your Strawman. It is a separate you. It is a corporation, created by gov't to defraud you, and make many more laws apply to Strawman, which you are responsible for. Strawman is always the Debtor in legal proceedings, and the Creditor almost always wins because of their superior status. so your Strawman has relegated you to the status of "Slave."

I've started a book, and here are some excerpts:

“Part of getting you to see how the government defrauds you and betrays you is to show you their method in the use of contracts.”
He held up a Federal 1040 tax form. "Does anyone know why the word 'Label' is printed in the far upper left?hand corner of our tax forms?" Silence. "If you look in a big, thick dictionary, one of the definitions is the word "codicil." A codicil is an attachment to a will or contract, but essentially, the word 'Label' on your 1040 Form means 'contract."' There were several questions, and he gave other examples and uses of a codicil.
“For this contract to be legal, the parties of the contract must be identified. Your name is printed near the top here on a sticky label. At least, it looks like your name, but it's printed in all?capital letters. Have you ever signed or printed your name like that? Does anybody?" There were a lot of shaking heads in the crowd.
This is how they have stolen your identity, or actually, given you a new identity that you’re not aware of. Your name is printed that way on your Birth Certificate. It's printed that way on your Social Security card. It's that way on your bank statement. In fact, every government statement has your name printed that way. But Strawman is totally separate from you.
“That all?capital?lettered name is your Strawman, or stramineus homo; the name they have given to the corporation that you are responsible for. Every time we see an all?capital?lettered name, it is a corporate name; not a living, breathing, sentient being we will call man or woman, but a juristic fiction created by and distinct from the natural men and women who make it up. It's a dead thing that exists only on paper. This Strawman is a fictitious person; a fictitious entity.
“If you look up the word 'Strawman' in Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Ed., it says: 'A fictitious person, especially one that is weak or flawed.' But the third definition is even more telling: 'A third party used in some transaction as a temporary transferee to allow the principal parties to accomplish something that is otherwise impermissible.’
"The Strawman, or corporate name assigned to you, allows something that is 'otherwise impermissible.’ They are defrauding you here, and doing something behind your back, but they have all of these documents with your signature and your Strawman name, so you have confirmed it, and must know what you are doing.
"Part of any contract with you is your signature. Try sending this form in without your signature and the IRS will send it right back to you, with instructions that you must sign the form.
"Why do they need a signed contract with you?" he asked.
Somebody piped in, "To arrest you when you don't pay," and everyone laughed.
"True," he continued, "but if they have the authority to tax you, why do they need your permission? If they need your permission, they are defrauding you by tricking you into thinking you have to sign the form. That's exactly what is going on. This form is unconstitutional. In order for them to tax you, you must sign away your constitutional rights."
More questions arose, followed by more direct answers.
"Essentially," continued Bradley, "we've found by trial and error that there is no law that requires you to pay federal income taxes—federal income tax is voluntary."

In legal proceedings and in commerce, there are only two classes of people: Debtors and Creditors. There is no middle ground. If you can establish your sovereignty in law, you become the Creditor, and any adverse party in dispute with you is relegated to the inferior status of Debtor. But since you have failed to establish sovereignty in law, and already have the Mark of the Beast, you do not hold title to anything; you have no legal capacity and are devoid of standing to assert any rights. No title means no standing to make a claim. As long as you remain silent (or hire a lawyer, which relegates you to silence), you remain a permanent Debtor, and must always lose in any dispute with the system. You think you own your house? Miss one property tax payment and see who really owns it.
Congressman Dale Sheltrown stated: "The bottom line is that you don't own your property; you rent it from the State." June 23, 1999.
From Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congress, 1st Session (March 9 - June 16, 1933): "The ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called ownership is only by virtue of the government, i.e. law amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State."
You retain your property by permission only. When, not if, a situation or dispute with the system arises, you will lose. That's why they can confiscate your car or house when they find a little marijuana. That's why they can take half of your estate when you die. That's why the government can prosecute you in a federal, Article IV/Bankruptcy court designed for corporations only. That's why you need a license to drive, marry, run a business, or sneeze. You only exist by permission.
The State, through BAR Attorneys, has turned everything into corporations and corporate trusts, even you, so they can control the populace through commerce. A purchase is not an acquisition according to BAR Attorneys. Presumed Debtors cannot hold legal title to anything, and therefore own nothing, except by permission. Congress has presumed that all people are 14th Amendment (1848) Federal citizens of the UNITED STATES and State residents.
Remember the cardinal, central principle of commerce and courts of law: "An unrebutted claim, charge, or affidavit stands as the truth." Failure to rebut is agreement by silence. It is therefore self-evident that fraud must be legal in order for a government to exist. By assenting to the existence of government, you have assented to the legality of fraud.
American men and women are relegated to the same status as all corporations. They are therefore subject to the same kind of licensing by the State. Licensing pertains only to corporate, artificial persons or corporate subjects. The new all-capital lettered Strawman name fits both categories. Accordingly, we are led to believe that we need to procure a license to do almost anything.
Until the Fifties, only chauffeurs and truckers—only those engaged in transportation for hire or profit—were required to have a license: Chauffeur License and Operator License respectively. Eventually, we were all deceived into believing that because we drive, we are required to have a license, even though we are not what the word "driver" actually refers to in the Statute. Flesh and blood "people" do not need a license. However, “persons," their new all-capital letter names of Straw Men, are required to have one.
According to the Uniform Commercial Code, UCC 1-201(30), "A person is a corporation, an individual." Which leads us to other definitions; from Ballentine's Dictionary, "Individual: pertaining to one person alone; a corporation.” Or consider, "Human being: A person being male or female." "Male: A person or animal of the masculine sex.” "Body: (3) Artificial person created by a legal authority. See corporation."
When the flesh-and-blood sentient men and women of America have been reclassified by the law and government as non-essential, non-existent fictions with no standing or import, the object and direction of government takes on a new significance. When you read the law with the secret codes revealed, it takes on new meaning. There’s been a switch in definitions of terms in law, a little slight-of-hand trick, and nobody told us and the attorneys don’t care, because they’re still paying for their BMW. Oh yes, and this is completely legal. Just make up the rules as you go, and nobody will notice; not enough to matter.
It is significant that the only major profession in America that does not have a license is that of an attorney. Attorneys do not need permission from those they have conquered; only their BAR card, which proves their dues are current and that they have taken an "Oath" to uphold the law and the System. This is their primary concern and function; to ensure that the system remains legally fraudulent and that a corporate person remains silent.
Only BAR Attorneys speak in Article IV courts, and a person or corporation must remain silent. The duty of the attorney to his client is way down the list of his priorities. BAR Attorneys run a clear monopoly in our courtrooms and inherently have multiple conflicts of interest (what happened to the Sherman Antitrust Act? Is it only enforceable against Standard Oil Co.?) Between judge and attorney (both attorneys of the same brotherhood), court procedure is little more than two wolves and a sheep deciding what to have for dinner.
In the Amendatory Act to the Trading With the Enemy Act of March 9, 1933, also known as the "War Powers Act," codified at USC 50 App., the American people were legally classified as enemies of their own government. To do business with their new enemy, the U.S. Government thereafter instituted wholesale licensing to the subjects of the enemy to carry on trade. Each new President immediately re-affirms The Act as his first official act upon taking office, and cannot claim ignorance as to what he is doing.

Answer 2

Straw man is defined as:

a person to whom title to property or a business interest is transferred for the sole purpose of concealing the true owner and/or the business machinations of the parties. Thus, the straw man has no real interest or participation but is merely a passive stand-in for a real participant who secretly controls activities. Sometimes a straw man is involved when the actual owner is not permitted to act, such as a person with a criminal record holding a liquor license. 2) an argument which is intended to distract the other side from the real issues or waste the opponent's time and effort, sometimes called a "red herring" (for the belief that drawing a fish across a trail will mislead hunting dogs).

Answer 3

A person who is set up as a cover or front for a questionable enterprise.
An argument or opponent set up so as to be easily refuted or defeated.
A bundle of straw made into the likeness of a man and often used as a scarecrow.

Answer 4

The expression is Pagan in origin.In China it is a straw dog,which is ceremoniously burned during rites to expiate guilt and responsibility for wrongdoing.It is an offering to the gods.Similar rites involving scarecrows and effigies were popular amongst Western Pagans in ancient times and remnants of these rites are still perpetuated.They symbolise the offering up of a scapegoat in place of the real culprit.

Answer 5

It can mean political figure head.


Anoun
1 scarecrow, straw man, strawman, bird-scarer, scarer
an effigy in the shape of a man to frighten birds away from seeds
Category Tree:
entity
╚object; physical object
╚artifact; artefact
╚creation
╚representation
╚effigy; image; simulacrum
╚scarecrow, straw man, strawman, bird-scarer, scarer
2 straw man, strawman
a weak or sham argument set up to be easily refuted
Category Tree:
abstraction
╚relation
╚social relation
╚communication
╚indication; indicant
╚evidence
╚argument; statement
╚specious argument
╚straw man, strawman
3 front man, front, figurehead, nominal head, straw man, strawman
a person used as a cover for some questionable activity
Category Tree:
entity
╚object; physical object
╚living thing; animate thing
╚organism; being
╚person; individual; someone; somebody; mortal; human; soul
╚bad person
╚wrongdoer; offender
╚deceiver; cheat; cheater; trickster; beguiler; slicker
╚front man, front, figurehead, nominal head, straw man, strawman

Answer 6

Whats A Strawman

Answer 7

A straw man argument is a rhetorical technique based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.

Answer 8

Taz:

I came in on this ? 'cause I can't seem to email u - I get a message that says ur email is not confirmed! Any way the answer to ur first ? 2 me is Yes he is. 2nd ? answer: we technically all could be if we chose to be involved in illegal activity. Check ur email address & b sure it is correct - like I said I coundn't reply to u on the email u sent me or by using ur email on ur bio pg, think u need [e-mail] or waht ever try again & email me with the correct email address for u. I'll answer tomorrow I"ve got to go get some sleep I've been up almost 24hrs!

Answer 9

Its a man who eats lots of straws ha ha ha

Answer 10

straw man is a thin man that looks like a straw hahahahaha...

Answer 11

This a new term to me.

LC