Errr, not really.
You must also understand that evolution in no way says anything about the origins of life. That's a whole other subject ;).
2006-06-15 19:27:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Leonidas 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh I know... a god came down and made this garden and put a man in it. Then a women was made from his rib. Then a disgruntled angel decided hey I want to be a snake today and tell them to eat from a certain tree because I guess my god likes testing new creations with stupo sh** tests. And then Moses parted waters with a staff, and, and, and, Noah put all the millions of species of animals in a tiny little ark. And, and, and, John writing Revelation wasn't on drugs like some might suspect, but was inspired by a god to predict the most easiest things in the world to predict which is negative events. And there was this women that became a pillar of salt too!
Come on, lets get out of the primitive view points of how the world works and start doing some research.
2006-06-16 03:12:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by lanthus1 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, we came from the stars first. Nuclear fusion in stars creates all the elements. When old stars die and explode, these elements are scattered throughout the universe and some reach earth. When the earth was young and cooled enough, these elements combined with water and light and under the right conditions formed a protein in a primordial soup which began as the simplest form of life. After eons of time and mutations all livings things evolved including humans. I know you don't accept this because you've been taught that God made man in his own image from dust and clay and that's easier for you to believe than scientific evidence. My point is, you shouldn't ask questions in a science category and expect religious confirmation.
2006-06-16 06:21:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by wefields@swbell.net 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
a while after the theory that organic life arose from inorganic matter was proposed, it was apparently disproved by Louis Pasteur. but Charles Darwin believed and supported this theory. if u research the theory, u'll find that it actually makes sense and so the theory is definitely a possibility and to me it's not just a theory, it's a fact - it's what happened. but, of course, it comes down to what u choose to believe. u can at the very least entertain the theory if not accept it. it certainly is more logical and sensible than the stories of creation/origin of life that so many millions believe in.
2006-06-16 02:56:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by shraddha 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh here we go again! The first form of life was bacteria, which evolved by feeding on the chemistry of rocks, and mutated into tiny swimming creatures, then fish, then amphibians, then mammals. There is scientific proof of this. What proof do you have that we were created by God? If you want to believe in God, then you can still claim that HE set off a chemical reaction and watched it evolve over billions of years. Stop denying evolution!
2006-06-16 02:35:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Shona L 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're misinterpreting the science.
Simple organic molecules (probable source: electrical discharges applied to the primitive atmosphere) in water (probable source: comets) combined to form the first building blocks of life.
One theory is that certain types of clay acted as a structural matrix (having an affinity for organic molecules) to concentrate these organic molecules sufficiently to make self-replicating units (probably RNA) possible.
And the alternative theory is???? MAGIC!!
I'll stick with evolutionary theory...thanks
2006-06-16 02:28:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by bootothead 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Quite possibly a meteor (rock) started the evolutionary process, but I certainly did not come from one. We can be linked to single-celled organisms "evolved" from proteins and other nutrients due to the humid and warm conditions of Earth at the time, as well as other factors no doubt brought on by the "rock."
2006-06-16 02:30:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know I didn't come from no rock, and evolutionist need their heads examined, because human beings were not created from rocks. lol.
2006-06-16 02:26:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by farside76 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No that's what creationists think evolutionists think.
Do you really think you came from a lump of clay, hypocrite?
That's what creationists really believe.
2006-06-16 09:18:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by corvis_9 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The theory of evolution makes more sense to me than humankind being created out of dust and clay.
2006-06-16 02:35:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Tan B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋