2006-06-15 17:21:22 · 11 answers · asked by jessec 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
One might think that China would fit the bill. Certainly as an economic power house this would seem to be so but along with the economic advantages come the huge population and problems with different cultures unified temporarily under mow. I believe the country will be torn apart by feuding between wealthy political groups. The great divide between rich and poor is far more advanced than outsiders normally perceive..
I believe provided Australia tightens up its migration pro gramme and actively encourages non Muslim educated migrants it will be the world leader in the future. For its population it si already the cleverest country. There is little poverty. A working family can easily afford to own there own home 3 bed and a garden. Australians have a strong sense of justice and an equally strong work ethic and common sense. There are more natural resources per head of population than any other country in the world. The legal system though not perfect is freer of politics than the US. They have three tiers of government most elected every three years. Potentially anyone can stand for parliament and they are not afraid of jailing dishonest politicians. The premier of Western Australia was jailed for corruption in the 1980's. It is a fair free country.
2006-06-15 18:41:34 · answer #1 · answered by david m 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. besides the indisputable fact that the headline misconstrues what Vidal suggested. Vidal did not mean we would have a protection pressure dictatorship "lower than Obama". He suggested “We’ll have a protection pressure dictatorship quickly, on the theory no one else can carry each thing jointly". "no one else" refers back to the protection pressure, no longer Obama. In previous paragraphs Vidal says Obama is a f*ck up who has actual no understanding of protection pressure concerns and isn't any longer utilising the skill of the president like Lincoln did and would nicely be assassinated. Obama is a civilian. I finish Vidal replaced into relating a real coup through the protection pressure. it type of feels not likely to me that this may ensue "quickly", yet I i'd not rule it out in the destiny. some thing of the quote: "Obama would were more desirable suitable off focusing on training the american people. His problem is being overeducated. He doesn’t comprehend how dim-witted and ignorant his target market is.” Vidal has continuously been the epitome of an effete psychological snob. He thinks all people no longer as sensible as he's (he's fantastic) is a moron.
2016-10-30 23:38:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
China will get the best economy, and all the political benefits that come with being a giant economy.
2006-06-15 18:03:14 · answer #3 · answered by BenBen1205 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
economy China...
political regime... I guess it depends on how you classify it and what you think is "best," but I'm a fan of Sweden...
2006-06-15 17:35:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the countries of Africa and South America could unite, that would be something! As it stands, I'm thinking India.
2006-06-15 17:38:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
India,as it is the country that is developing every day in its technology and economy.
2006-06-15 17:59:58 · answer #6 · answered by mujtabashareef 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
China/India/US/Japan are the choices... now considering political regime.. it could be US/Japan...
2006-06-15 17:25:00 · answer #7 · answered by TJ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's hard to say, but with the way things are going, I'm putting my money on Germany...Possibly Japan.
2006-06-15 17:25:21 · answer #8 · answered by Chris_Knows 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
China.
It is growing like a weed.
2006-06-15 17:25:19 · answer #9 · answered by Texas Cowboy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
india
2006-06-15 17:24:33 · answer #10 · answered by champ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋