English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

The gov uses smoke and mirrors to hide the facts things like this:
Or for people who are making fun of those who claim everything is about oil. There's also this little fact:

The Alaska state constitution claims common heritage rights of ownership of oil and other minerals for the people of the state as a whole. Citizen dividend checks are distributed every year in Alaska out of the interest payments to an oil royalties deposit account called the Alaska Permanent Fund (APF) created in 1976 after oil was discovered on the North Slope. The APF is a public trust fund - a diversified stock, bond and real estate portfolio - into which are deposited the oil royalties received from the corporations which extract the oil from the lands of Alaska. The first citizen dividend check from the interest of the APF was issued in 1982 and was for $1000 per every person for everyone in Alaska who had resided in the state for at least one year. Annual citizen dividends have been issued every year since then, for a total of more than $23,000 per person.

In 2003, each of the nearly 600,000 Alaska US citizens (residents of Alaska for at least one year) received a check for $1,107 from the APF. The total amount dispersed was $663.2 million. The $25 billion investment fund's core experienced stock market losses which led to the dividend's decline this past year compared to the several previous years. The amount was $433 less, a 28 percent drop from the 2002 pay out of $1,540, and a 44 percent decrease from the all-time high of $1,964 in year 2000. The amount changes based on a five-year average of APF investment income derived from the bonds, stock dividends, real estate and other investments.

Alaska relies on oil for about 80 percent of its revenue and has no sales or income tax. Alaska state government is mandated to invest 25% of its oil revenue into the APF while the other 75% of oil royalty revenue is dispersed to other government funds to finance education, infrastructure and social services. If 100% of Alaska's oil royalties had been deposited into the APF, it is conceivable that the CD this year could have been about $4,400 or $17,600 for a family of four. But then there would have been no funds for roads, education and other public services and no funds available to run the state legislature - a libertarian dream fulfillment or a social and economic disaster, which one we will never know. If state services were to have been maintained while 100% of oil royalties were deposited in the APF, there would of course have been the need for income, sales and other taxes on wages and production.

Hoover Institution
Kuwait:

Democracy, Kuwait Style
Peter Berkowitz



It’s not that the woman question was the only issue faced by voters. From the owner and editor in chief of Kuwait’s largest newspaper, to the chief executive officer of Kuwait Petroleum Company, to the former Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States, our interlocutors argued that the Kuwaiti economy is stagnating and that the remedy is privatization. This is a difficult proposition, however, in a country where 90 to 95 percent of the labor force is employed by the government, which generally pays more than the private sector. And designing institutions to create the right incentives will be difficult in a country whose oil wealth supports a massive welfare state with no taxes that generously funds its citizens’ health, education, and housing needs.

If Alaska pays
Kuwait pays even it’s indirectly after the gulf war losses
Dubai pays

Why can’t your state pay you? With all the resources of the feds why can’t the feds pay 50 times what Alaska pays?

The dems and reps have all the power shouldn’t they have the responsibility for their mismanagement?

VOTE! Vote for anyone as long as they’re not a dem or rep!

If our founding father were alive today. They would lay siege to DC tar and feather ALL the officials and hang them on the steps for all to see the consequences of screwing Americans!!

There must be security for all, or none are secure!
This requires losing no freedoms, only to act responsibly!

2006-06-15 21:36:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Are you kidding me? They care, alright, but the taxpayers have no say in what the government does with their tax money. Do you know how much the war has cost so far, not only in money, but in lives - which I know is a different subject - but what was the point of it. 2500 American soldiers have been killed, and more will be, and that's almost as many as 9/11 - so what was the point?

2006-06-15 14:22:35 · answer #2 · answered by theophilus 5 · 0 0

because Our Elected authorities officials are promoting out u . s . a . on an standard bases. the most important persons responsible for it truly is the State of Texas, the voters of Texas and Roma, and the federal authorities for giving Texas any tax funds for the Texas college structures in Texas. commence eliminating money from the State, and watch how briskly they commence conforming to the guidelines and guidelines!

2016-10-30 23:23:39 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Do you realize just how much foreign investment is in the United States? If it wasn't for foreign capital--our housing market would be a shambles--and our lifestyle would be negatively impacted (to say the least).

2006-06-15 13:10:30 · answer #4 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 0 0

Because it is usually to help give relief aid to countries that suffered a natural disaster.

2006-06-15 13:10:45 · answer #5 · answered by nighthawk_842003 6 · 0 0

We do care. It's just that our elected officials don't. I know I have sent multiple letters of complaint and concern to mine and I only get a "Thank you for your comment" in return.

2006-06-15 13:11:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Same as the first answer!

2006-06-15 13:10:36 · answer #7 · answered by ☼Jims Brain☼ 6 · 0 0

it is not just the US that does that but other countries too.

2006-06-15 13:10:22 · answer #8 · answered by greeneyes634970 4 · 0 0

We do care, but there is not much we can do about it.

2006-06-15 13:10:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers