2006-06-15 12:23:01 · 8 answers · asked by christine2550@sbcglobal.net 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No - the President did not blunder - he only lied.
His intention was to invade Iraq regardless of WMD - the reasons put out were just a smoke screen of lies.
2006-06-15 12:28:50 · answer #1 · answered by fatsausage 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, it is a big blunder. But not by the current President. Even the U.N. said there were weapons of mass destruction. Because of not acting soon enough Mr. Hussein was able to move them. The question should be: Where are they?
2006-06-15 19:29:38 · answer #2 · answered by c.j.git 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no everyone was telling bush that they were there. the cia the russians the fbi the uk so with the information he had he made the right decision and plus in a few years gas prices are going to get very cheap and we have a foothold in the middle east so now when iran tries to start something we can invade easily
2006-06-15 19:29:11 · answer #3 · answered by staterules9 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is right up there with Vietnam and Bay Of Pigs.
We never learn from history however. Another 500 billion not going to health care, education or roads
He should have listened to the UN inspectors
2006-06-15 19:26:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. It was absolutely pointless to to go to war, and it was a bad move by Bush to not pull out troops from Iraq
2006-06-15 19:26:24 · answer #5 · answered by blah blah 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes but Bush still takes no responsibility for his actions
2006-06-15 19:27:40 · answer #6 · answered by laura w 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I'd say so
2006-06-15 19:26:44 · answer #7 · answered by Joel 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
... I don't know about biggest... but it's not good...
2006-06-15 19:27:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋