English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

I acknowledge Bush has made errors. Contrary to the beliefs of some, he IS human (and NOT possessed). I agree though, that he is a sincere man. He has been forced into decisions that history will judge. I hope for all our sakes, that they are the right ones.

2006-06-15 11:22:54 · answer #1 · answered by aboukir200 5 · 0 0

The left wingers would probably put fat ba$tard Michael Moore in office if they had it there way. Or worse, Al Franken.

Then you would see how quickly the U.S. goes doen the toilet.

That's what I can't stand about liberals and/or democrats that ***** and ***** about the president yet not ONE will step forward and attempt to make a change or make a difference. All they do is complain about the current administration but don't have any ideas of plans of their own.

Remember John Kerry's, "I have a plan"....well? what the hell happened to this "plan"?? Where is it?? Are you not going to share this plan because you lost the election like a spoiled 7 year old that didn't get their way??

Or, was there ANY plan to begin with? Or just telling the American People what they wanted to hear just to get in office and THAN you would think of something??

Idiots. Stop complaining and DO something about it!

In response to G:

G,

I’m well aware of the way congress works and how laws come to pass however I’m not talking about passing laws; I’m talking about taking leadership.

If liberal and democratic leaders really wanted to make a change, they would put forth a candidate that could’ve knocked GW out of office during the last election. Instead it puts forth John Kerry??

By no means do I agree with all of Bush’s decisions however, he’s the only one making decisions and taking a leadership role in our country. Obviously, as the President, he has to do this however if one man (or woman) were to step forward with better ideas or a better ideology, don’t you think the American people would’ve jumped at the chance?

Instead, we go into the voting booth and we have Bush (crap) or Kerry (also crap) to choose from.

Not all “change” is good.

I hope you’re right, that the next couple of elections we do see a change….a better change.

At the moment though, neither party has a descent candidate to run for office. I hope it’s not another choosing the lesser of two evils.

2006-06-15 18:20:47 · answer #2 · answered by Shep 5 · 0 0

Shep: here's a quick lesson in government... since you obviously have no clue how it works...

you see.. there is this thing called the MAJORITY... which the republicans have, that means that the Democrats don't have the votes to pass laws... it's hard to get anything done, when the other party has control and doesn't really care what ideas you have, even if it's a cure for cancer...

This explains what happened to the "plan"... where is Bush's or any Republicans plan? I think they just met to form a plan over the weekend... YEARS AFTER THE IRAQ WAR HAS BEGUN????

Wait for the next couple of elections... I think you will see SOME ACTION...

As to the question... I like Edwards... and Obama...

2006-06-15 18:24:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think Hillary Clinton would make a better president, she is a strong, intelligent woman that is not afraid to stand up for what is right. She would have an excellant adviser in her husband, the last legally elected president. He was also the most successful in running the country in over 40 years. Bush is a liar, and a war criminal. He should be on trial right now for his crimes against humanity.

2006-06-15 18:23:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush has no character he is a bigger lier than most w.m.d. he knew that was a lie and yet he continues to carry on an unpopular military operation with no real exit strategy just because he can't admit he screwed up.Socks the cat would make a better president,or how about Hillary 2008!

2006-06-15 18:39:04 · answer #5 · answered by thestendfactor 3 · 0 0

A certifiable megalomaniac and a war criminal. George W. Bush is suffering from a peculiar but not that uncommon form of madness in which a pathological part of his psyche has co-opted all of the healthy parts into its service. An unknown condition, where ‘something’ has taken possession of a smaller or greater portion of the psyche and asserts its hateful and harmful existence undeterred by all our insight, reason, and energy, thereby proclaiming the power of the unconscious over the conscious mind, the sovereign power of possession. Bush has been taken over by an unconscious complex of the collective unconscious. We speak of a mother complex, or a father complex, but Bush has what we could call a savior complex. Inflated by the power, Bush is suffering from delusions of grandeur, and has become megalomaniac. He is unconsciously identified with the archetype of the Messiah. Bush told an Amish group in 2004 that “God speaks through me.”
Bush imagines that God actually speaks to him as well; in 2003 he told Palestinian ministers that God told him to invade Iraq. “One should listen to the inner voice attentively, intelligently and critically, (Probate spiritus!) [test the spirits], because the voice one hears is the influxus divinus consisting, as the Acts of John aptly state, of “right” and “left” streams, i.e., of opposites. They have to be clearly separated so that their positive and negative aspects become visible.” John 4:1 says, “Do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits whether they are of God.”
Just because one hears an inner voice doesn’t necessarily mean it is the voice of God. Listened to uncritically, we could just as easily be seduced by the Devil. Bush has become inflated with an archetype of the collective unconscious, which is an expression of madness.
He has become identified with one side, the light, of an inherently two-sided polarity, and projects out the other, dark side, which he then tries to destroy. By shadow projecting in this manner, Bush has become possessed by the very evil he is projecting outside of himself.
This is to fall under the spell of the Devil, who is rightly called “the deceiver.” A clearer case of madness is hard to imagine.

2006-06-15 18:16:41 · answer #6 · answered by Biomimetik 4 · 0 0

anyone would be a better president than bush.paris hilton could be a better president.

2006-06-15 18:57:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

uuuugggghhhh

These anti-Bush rants just go on and on...

2006-06-22 14:16:27 · answer #8 · answered by Think First 2 · 0 0

How many times are you going to ask this?

Aside from being a liar, theif, CIA name leaker, and Fascist, these are this months reasons!!

Date Total Name Place of Death - Province Cause of Death
15-Jun-2006 3 | US: 3 | UK: 0 | Other: 0
US DETAILS NOT RELEASED YET (Actual Date Not Known) Not reported yet Not reported yet
US DETAILS NOT RELEASED YET (Actual Date Not Known) Not reported yet Not reported yet
US DETAILS NOT RELEASED YET (Actual Date Not Known) Not reported yet Not reported yet
09-Jun-2006 5 | US: 5 | UK: 0 | Other: 0
US Lance Corporal Salvador Guerrero Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire
US Seaman Zachary M. Alday Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire - mine
US Private 1st Class Ben Slaven Ad Diwaniyah - Qadisiyah Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
US Lance Corporal Brent Zoucha Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
US Sergeant Jose M. Velez Kirkuk - At-Ta'mim Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
08-Jun-2006 3 | US: 3 | UK: 0 | Other: 0
US Sergeant 1st Class Clarence D. McSwain Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
US Sergeant 1st Class Daniel Crabtree Al Kut - Wasit Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
US Specialist Luis D. Santos Buhriz - Diyala Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
07-Jun-2006 3 | US: 3 | UK: 0 | Other: 0
US 2nd Lieutenant John Shaw Vaughan Mosul - Ninawa Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire
US Private 1st Class David N. Crombie Ramadi - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
US 1st Lieutenant Scott M. Love Ramadi - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
06-Jun-2006 7 | US: 6 | UK: 0 | Other: 1
US Sergeant Mark T. Smykowski Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire
US Staff Sergeant Richard A. Blakley Khaldiyah (near) - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - small arms fire
US Corporal Andy D. Anderson Ramadi - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire
US Sergeant Carlos E. Pernell Ramadi - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire
DK Private 1st Class Dennis Ove Hansens Camp Dannevang - Basrah Non-hostile - vehicle accident
US 1st Lieutenant Ryan T. Sanders Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
US Sergeant Daniel Gionet Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
05-Jun-2006 4 | US: 3 | UK: 0 | Other: 1
US Specialist Issac S. Lawson Baghdad Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
US Petty Officer 1st Class Gary Rovinski Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
US Petty Officer 2nd Class Jamie Jaenke Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
IT Caporal Alessandro Pibiri An Nasiriyah (60 miles from) - Maysan Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
03-Jun-2006 4 | US: 4 | UK: 0 | Other: 0
US Major Michael D. Stover Al Anbar Province Non-hostile
US Staff Sergeant Darren Harmon Hadithah - Anbar Non-hostile
US Corporal Ryan J. Cummings Al Anbar Province Hostile - hostile fire
US Private 1st Class Brett L. Tribble Ramadi - Anbar Hostile - hostile fire - IED attack
Total 29 | US: 27 | UK: 0 | Other: 2

2006-06-15 18:18:48 · answer #9 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers