Are you outta your mind!?!? Two guaranteed starters who put up guaranteed numbers EVERY week for two pine riders? Uhhhh...no. Besides, Young won't put up any quality FFL numbers for at least three years.
If you're in a keeper league, drop Vick and pick up Leinert--his future's golden with those receivers and a stud RB. Young is iffy at best, and Vick--while a human highlight reel--has never put up big FFL points.
2006-06-15 12:55:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by TNorth 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
OMG! I wish I was on the other side of the trade. Of course rookies are selling high, but for way too much! Don't trade starters for back ups. Well Young is probably going to be starter, and Lienhart will start before the end of the season, but it isn't worth it.
MAYBE, consider it, ONLY if you're in a keeper league.
2006-06-16 01:12:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ez E 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Young and Lienart wont get many touches, and areent going to put up numbers. Vick and Brees will put up good numbers.
2006-06-15 22:20:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell no. Vick and Brees are still pretty young and they're proven commodities. Young and Leinart may be great but history says that one of them (at least) will be a mediocre to poor player.
2006-06-15 20:26:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Peredhel 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vick--Starter, Brees--Starter....Young--bench, Lienart--bench....HMMMM???
2006-06-15 18:18:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by m 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
In two words : HELL NO! You dont trade to vets for two rookies before the football season starts. Espically rookie QB's.
2006-06-15 18:34:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by letgomyeggo32 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Why trade players you know will put up numbers this year for guys who may not even start?
2006-06-15 18:06:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR MIND? Let me guess you picked Reggie Bush 1st.
2006-06-15 22:02:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by jtsports92 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
heck no
2006-06-16 12:36:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-06-15 22:13:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Buyaksha360 3
·
0⤊
0⤋