He is VERY creative,
He prefers to wear his hair long,
He NEVER marries,
He appreciates the finer things in life,
He hangs out & parties with several good looking men,
woman are less prominent in his life,
wears a tunic style of dress,
nurtures beauty to exist
and is peaceful in demeanor - not a fighter.
I'm just asking...because if Jesus Christ showed up today we would all brand him as a homo!
My point: Be careful in who you judge and on what basis you make those judgements.
2006-06-15
10:33:23
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Social Science
➔ Sociology
To Breanna V : Not all homos sodomize each other just like not all men sodomize their wife/girlfriend!
Do you even know any homos? Or are you in some backwoods somewhere or otherwise shut in?
2006-06-15
10:50:07 ·
update #1
To: Antisocial_1981: What is yuor point?
Not all homos today have long hair either!
2006-06-15
10:51:38 ·
update #2
To Pablo: "He was despised, rejected, and men hide their faces from him!"
You'e right (insert sarcasm) that couldn't possibly describe a homo's life!
2006-06-15
10:55:55 ·
update #3
TO Pablo: Oh and you're right - you are an idiot.
2006-06-15
10:58:34 ·
update #4
To DMArie: Turning water into wine is many a gay man's dream!
And I think alot of gay men have important woman in their lives.
The dress of the time - bah! Who defines that? So I guess it was okay with you that our founding fathers wore wigs and heels too...because that "was the dress of the time". WAKE UP honey, you are a sheep!
2006-06-15
11:20:00 ·
update #5
And let'snot forget that he never had SEX with a woman.
2006-06-15
11:20:33 ·
update #6
He also had a wife and kid, and a German Sheppard named "Rex."??????????
The story of Christ has gone through so many hands, been changed by so many Popes, had so much deleted from it (according to majority vote), it's impossible to reconstruct an unbiased account.
The truth is that religion is a hiding place. If the "bad guy" is described as something that sounds different than the people doing all the judging, they'll jump up and down.
People that have something worth knowing teach it by example. They don't have the insecurity that leads people to divide the whole world, as well as any given situation, into "good guys and bad guys."
2006-06-15 12:03:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree with Pablo and Galaxiquestar.
The Bible doesn't refer to Jesus as creative - ever. He is The Creator. The words don't mean the same thing.
In all actuality, he probably didn't have long hair. Those are merely artist depictions.
He did not marry. That is correct.
He had no personal possessions and would go days without eating. Where does it say He enjoyed the finer things in life?
He didn't really party - although he attended a wedding and turned water into wine. There is no reference to what the disciples looked like.
There were several women who were extremely important to Jesus.
He wore the dress of the men of the time.
Jesus is love. The beauty He nurtures is in our souls, not outward appearances.
He is a peacemaker, that's true. But He fights the devil for our very souls.
My point: be careful what you say unless you truly have all the FACTS. Calling other human beings "homo" sounds a bit judgemental to me.
2006-06-15 18:12:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by DMarie 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a Christian and I have good homosexual friends, so I am glad to hear your comments, but...
How was Jesus creative? If you're counting the creation of the universe; that hardly counts since that was a long time before he was born as a man.
How did he appreciate "the finer things in life" when he lived a life of poverty? To redefine those things as anything good in life makes no sense since everybody appreciates good things.
And "nutures beauty to exist" means what? Did he have a garden or some other hobby that we don't know about? Did he have a makeover show? I'm sorry if this is starting to sound kind of sarcastic, but you don't help the cause if you sound irrational. Since I'm guessing you just copied the "question" from some article you read, maybe you should have 1. paraphrased, and 2. given credit to the writer, mediocre as he or she is.
2006-06-15 17:50:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by galaxiquestar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hogwash. Just because artists have painted Jesus to look the way you described, it doesn't mean he looked anything like that. And in those days, everybody dressed and looked that way.
Want a more accurate picture of Jesus? try Isaiah 53:
For he grew up before him like a young plant,
and like a root out of dry ground;
he had no form or majesty that we should look at him,
and no beauty that we should desire him.
3 He was despised and rejected [2] by men;
a man of sorrows, [3] and acquainted with [4] grief; [5]
and as one from whom men hide their faces [6]
he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
4 Surely he has borne our griefs
and carried our sorrows;
yet we esteemed him stricken,
smitten by God, and afflicted.
5 But he was wounded for our transgressions;
he was crushed for our iniquities;
upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace,
and with his stripes we are healed
- - - -
Yes we should be careful about judging people but some people wear their lifestyle on the outside quite obviously. They look like idiots, act like idiots because they ARE IDIOTS.
2006-06-15 17:43:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1.) If jesus christ showed up today he would NOT be labled as a Homo considering it is a moral sin/perversion
2.) It is traits of a very sweet guy
3.) if one of the traits you left out was that he "sodomizes" than he is very confused boy in the world and may suffer from lack of attention or was born genetically incomplete
2006-06-15 17:40:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Breanna V 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus was a Jew...Jews didn't have long hair back then.
In response to "Additional Details"
Yes, I know not all gay individuals have long hair. I was going off of your original post. You stated that this individual you were describing had long hair and were therefore insinuating that it was rather popular among gays to have long hair. Although all gays I know do not have long hair. Usually hippies or those going for the "rebel" look. So basically your original post and response to my post contradict
2006-06-15 17:40:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by antisocial1981 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with your point... however I must say this is a strange way to get your point across.
2006-06-15 17:37:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kamunyak 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am trying to understanding what your saying, it is little bit complex
2006-06-15 19:35:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by linesman 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe he is a homosexual.....or at least bi-sexual, sorry!
2006-06-16 00:40:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by RoxyRemix 2
·
0⤊
0⤋