Why can't liberals admit defeat by recognizing that the Bush Policies are working in Iraq?

Question

But yet they are more than willing to accept defeat for our toops by the IED's and bullets of terorists? Clearly the Al Zarqai letter proves that American & Iraqi troops are progressing and the rebellion is dying.

Areola - read the letter then comment.

kookoo - still counting troop deaths. that's something to be proud of. The more doom & gloom for troops and America = good for democraps. That's truly sad that you need troop deaths to have a good day! And you wonder why your party is in shambles and losing!

who is god - read the letter and you will discover that the terrorist can't even get to our troops becuase of the well trained Iraqis. Educate yourself.

To the rest of you liberals - if iraq was the wrong place to go - then why did your representatives authorize the president to invade! Your guys should of stood up in congress and suggested Pakistan - a member of the nuclear club. I think invading a country in possesion of nukes would have been much more benefical than taking out Saddam. Besides your short memories have forgotten that there were 14 UN resolutions broken by Saddam. And that the president did state that Iraq, Iran & NK were the axis of evil that harbours terrorists. Iraq was 1st and Iran is on the radar screen.

Answer 1

The problem with alot of liberals is they are fast at placing blame and making sure when the conservatives mess up they make a heck of a noise. When its them making mistakes they stay pretty quiet. They know that the policies are working, but they won't talk about that all they can talk about is what isn't working over there and in truth that just brings down the American moral and makes the public think its a failure. Its just liberal propaganda

Answer 2

His policy in Iraq is a long term one. We went after the Taliban in Afghanistan and Osama is in hiding. That was revenge and justice for 9/11. What fosters and promotes the hatred against America? The tyrannical and corrupt regimes like Saddam's. If a better way can take root there, and spread, in time other nations in the region like Syria, Iran, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the like will adopt more democratic and tolerent ways and be less of a threat to anyone.

Answer 3

nicely us of a is defeated, even consisting of your tremendous military you cant administration irak because the political difficulty is agains US, you could stay you won't be able to scape, Bush placed US in an imposible difficulty, even with in case you'd be the Roman empire if the political map is adversarial to you, you'll lose. The debt in us of a is increasing on a daily basis, under no circumstances in the U. S. historic previous replaced into so intense, the military in irak is so small to administration it, if you're conservative and help warfare nicely bypass through your self and bypass to strive against iraq, after all us of a have three hundred thousands and thousands of people they could be able to uncomplicated lose a minimum of one million of lives in the adventure that they opt to win? or the united states of a are so wealthy that would strive against 50 years and win?, nicely keep in suggestions the warfare between palestina and israel all started in 1948 and who can see an end that warfare, the people kind Asia have a infinity affected man or woman component that US people no longer. US cant win to a guerrilla warfare, US couldntt with Sandino, US couldn't with vietnam and US cant with iraqui insugency, the U. S. military isn't designed to such type of battling the under no circumstances had that type of warfare of their domicile land, they no longer, even in the civil warfare US cant comprehend the way it quite works, certainly is between the susceptible factors of the american empire. And US isn't so massive as your grandfathers were, Bush isn't Franklin roosvelt, the present era aren't to any extent further the infantrymen of the international warfare 2, US isn't the splendid producer in the international any more desirable and nicely the debt of the united states of a is so massive that's question of time for the defeated. the purely component that US can get is bypass out till now they get their hadrianople (desisive defeated of the roman empire and intensely last thanks to their fall) and till now debt crash them. Sorry besides the indisputable fact that the oil in iraq will be of China and Russia because they is familiar with a thanks to do international kin

Answer 4

So the goal of our invasion was to throw the sovereign country of Iraq into civil war? You're right, we did a "heckofa" job.
***
"To the rest of you liberals - if Iraq was the wrong place to go - then why did your representatives authorize the president to invade!" How about because our president lied to the entire nation, scaring us all in to the belief that Iraq had a huge surplus of WMDs?!? Had we known the truth, that there WERE NO WMDs, than maybe the Dems would have voted differently.

Answer 5

Why don't conservatives admit that we went in for all the wrong reasons and that the Bush administration has been lying to us from Day 1? I seem to remember in the 2000 campaign that Mr. Bush repeated over and over again that he wasn't going to get into the business of nation-building. That was Lie #1, and he has done nothing but tell more lies ever since!

Answer 6

uhh because iraq is on the brink of civil war

because bush has spent trillions of dollars and there are more terrorists in the world than there ever have been

if these policies are so effective and working, why are there new body bags being sent home everyday? why is there violence constantly on the news? why are 7 of 10 people in america convinced that they aren't working?

Answer 7

They can't accept it because if they did, they'd be admitting they are wrong, and they don't want to ever admit something like that. Same goes for the conservatives too.
Be careful taking full stock in the letter. It isn't written in the style of other letters/blogs so it may not be from him or his co-horts.

Answer 8

The "rebellion" was "in last throes" two years ago. You don't remember that? That was back when soldier casualties were at 1000, and now it's 2500. Yet you STILL fall for the lies you tell yourself.

Answer 9

Great question...they are just childish and will never accept defeat!! It's only good to them if a liberal leader gets the credit.

Answer 10

are you kidding me? bush policies are not working in Iraq.do you watch the news? 100's of u.s soldiers and Iraqi civilians are being killed everyday.bushes rating are at its lowest.republicians are even making fun him.so not only the liberals.get your facts straight!