English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Though I wish I had been the one to create this, I am in fact not. However, this is a piece of truth that most Americans are afraid to pay attention to at all, let alone give it any merit or thoughtful consideration. Just try people.... we were all duped!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main

2006-06-15 09:21:05 · 9 answers · asked by lydia_online 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

And just so other Bush propogaters such as the unenlightened darkemoregan know, I do not beleive that a missile did the damage either. But the question remains numb-nuts, WHERE IS THE AIRPLANE?!?!?!?!?! (And the fuel that was with it.)

2006-06-15 09:33:25 · update #1

AGAIN TO ALL.....watch this link. Awesome!

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main

2006-06-15 09:34:23 · update #2

BPS CAN YOU READ?!?! I did not ask where the planes that hit the WTC buildings are...I asked where the plane that hit the pentagon is. WAKE UP! WAKE UP! WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2006-06-15 09:45:02 · update #3

9 answers

I may not be the brightest bulb on the string, but there are two simple questions that haven't been answered to my satisfaction.

The first, is had anyone seen the plane as it was headed for the Pentagon? Specifically, anyone on the freeway or nearby roads? Anyone from the nearby hotel? A low flying plane of that size would have made tremendous noise that should have made at least one person look up. I don't remember any stories or news accounts of at least one witness who would be eager to be on TV and talk about such an experience.

Secondly, and I would think this is most important, the quote of the gas station attendant who says the FBI was there "in minutes after the crash" to grab the surveillance tapes. I do need the gentleman's exact definition of minutes, since the difference between two or three, as opposed to 20 or 30 would make or break the argument for conspiracy. I would fully expect the FBI to gather every piece of evidence available in the quickest manner, since at the time of the crash, the "who dunnit" list was supposedly wide open. However, if agents were gathering information literally minutes after the crash, that would raise and wave wildly every red flag.

Even if the argument was made that the Pentagon was a foreseeable target, and agents were in place, why weren't non-essential employees in the Pentagon directed to areas of safety?

The Secretary of Defense was in the building, during a national emergency. If it was prudent to have FBI agents at the ready to seize video of an air assault on the Pentagon from a gas station, why was the Secretary, 6th in line to the throne, left to sit in his office, venerable to attack?

Dedication to office? Nope...I just don't see that happening. Job and status guaranteed for 8 years? Might have been a gamble he offered to take...

It would explain why he didn't fall on his sword and resign, at the very least, to uphold the honor that is expected of anyone in command of the military after so many false claims of easy victory in Iraq.

2006-06-15 11:55:52 · answer #1 · answered by navymom 5 · 2 0

Don't even start me on this one, Squid boy. Just because they don't tell you something doesn't mean it's not happening. What are you, enlisted? Unless you're a General on the Presidents right hand side (or admiral, in your case) you would never know anything about a conspiracy. There is signifigant evidence that it was. I live in Pennsylvania. Did you know that on flight 93, the engine was found two miles away from the crash sight? What did the civilian passangers do, jettison the engine? I don't claim to say one way or the other, and I'm certainly not saying anything against the government (seeing as how I work for them, tride and true Army girl....), however, you cannot call someone an idiot just by looking at the whole pic. Take your eyes of the governments *** for a minute and look at reality.

2006-06-15 09:35:05 · answer #2 · answered by Issys 1 · 0 0

I don't trust anything George Bush does or says. I think he would stoop to any level to meet his agenda. Even so far as making sure a cruise missile hit the Pentegon. I also think the other plane was shot down by our airforce. I will never believe it crashed on its own.

What did happen to that plane. Can anyone with sense come up with a logical answer?

2006-06-15 09:31:12 · answer #3 · answered by Lou 6 · 0 0

You are an idiot just from believing this piece of garbage. I had several friends that were there on the day it happened. And I know for a fact that it wasn't a cruise missile that slammed into it. It's my navy job to know the flight profile of cruise missiles.

So do us a favor, and you and anyone who believes this garbage, need to remove yourselves from the gene pool.

Addendum: My friend watched them pull plane parts out of the building. Where they took it is another matter. And everyone quit with the ******* cruise missile bullshit.

THank you.

2006-06-15 09:27:44 · answer #4 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 0 0

Hey, Oliver Stone. Do you really believe that drivel you're shelling out? Talk about your conspiracy theory. Yeah, I know, Kennedy wasn't really killed, USA didn't land on the moon and I swear I saw Elvis at Wal-mart yesterday in the make-up aisle. Step back from the spray can and take a deep breath. Stop believing what you see on MTV.

2006-06-15 09:55:34 · answer #5 · answered by dctiger28 2 · 0 0

Everyone's heard of a disappearing airplane. Remember...Amelia Earnheart's.

2006-06-15 09:27:59 · answer #6 · answered by Joyce G 2 · 0 0

i know that some of the information has been debunked, but check out the link below and get yourself a copy of the movie it mentions.

i believe that JFK was killed, but i really don't think it was a single bullet that entered and exited his body multiple times that did it.

2006-06-15 10:20:09 · answer #7 · answered by stufetta 3 · 0 0

the quick answer is, it wasn't. Even the conspiracy information superhighway sites say there grow to be a hollow 15 ft for the time of, which has the same opinion properly with the very incontrovertible truth that the outer diameter of a 757 fuselage is somewhat over 12 ft. a large number of evidence accessible to help a 757 hitting the Pentagon. merely delusional kinds carry to the conspiracy theories.

2016-11-14 19:57:28 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

This conspiracy theory has been completely disproved by Popular Mechanics.

2006-06-15 09:40:46 · answer #9 · answered by BPS 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers