Republicans just dont take responsibility for their ridiculous actions regarding the budget, and just about everything else they screw up over there at Capital Hill, they just simply,, put the blame where ever they can, as long as, its not "Them". The Republican code of ethics and oath reads like this, beginning with this simple statement: "I dont recall" therefore I am not accountable".....
Come on , we all know for the most part Republicans are swindlers... and can fanagle there way out of just about anything when the start to feel the heat!
2006-06-15 08:12:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by chikymamasita 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
Both parties are spendthrifts, wasting the public monies on lavish and unconstitutional expenditures. But only the Democrats want to tax us more. I'd prefer less spending and less taxes, but the whores have to paint themselves up pretty for the next election.
I don't see any Democrats filibustering the huge bloated budget bills. Why not, if they are so opposed? Why not pull a Gingrich and grind the process to a halt? Because they are not against the spending.
This isn't conservative fiscal management.
2006-06-15 08:10:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
People like Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton who have lots of money and power and corruption. They will not let good GOP bills pass and therefore CAN be blamed for the state of the nation. Liberals never let the GOP fix things!
2006-06-15 08:26:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by musicqueen_yana 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
My, my, are you ignorant with regards to the topics. a million. The budget has decreased 12% seeing that President Obama has taken place of work. 2, you're repeating your self. Taxes for the middle type has actual long previous DOWN a normal of $2,000 according to taxpayer. 3. in the process the Bush administration, u.s. become dropping 800,000 jobs a month. below President Obama, we've had 29 on the instant months of inner maximum sector job strengthen of from one hundred,000 to a hundred and fifty,000 jobs a month. The republicant led states have been firing public sector firemen, police, instructors, etc at an increasing fee mutually as maximum Democratic led states have tried to maintain the employment secure. actuality is, seeing that 1961, Democrats have created two times as many roles as republicans even although they weren't in place of work as long because of the fact the republcans. 4. George W Bush saved the fee of two wars and Medicare section D off the books thoughout his administration. President Obama placed it on the books and republicans are falsely putting that fee against Obama somewhat of Bush. as nicely, if the tax cut back for the prosperous have been allowed to run out, maximum of that deficit would have been cut back. 5. No president has any skill over gas fees. liberating the oil reserves is a short term fix that finally would would desire to be replenished. on the different hand, President HAS allowed extra oil nicely enables than the different President AND subsequently, the united states is EXPORTING oil and a million/2 of it rather is gas to South u.s., China and India, the place fees are greater. 6. Who needs to guess? I purely addressed all your subjects. And it wasn't tense in any respect. z
2016-12-13 16:24:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are lucky Clinton had taxes. Where do you think the money for Iraq came from? Where do you think the money for Homeland security came from. If you don't want to contribute to the welfare of this country, don't pay taxes and let it go to hell. Me? I'll pay whatever it takes, since I already did my service in the Army for 12 years. Quit whining and give a little more, it won't kill you.
2006-06-15 08:05:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Truth 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The democrats answer to everything is to tax.
I won't blame them on spending, but on taxing, yes.
Why do you think Clinton had a surplus? He had higher taxes, and cut funding on programs, yes even social programs.
2006-06-15 07:59:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clintons "surplus" was nothing but manipulated numbers.The US hasnt had a budget surplus in over 30 years
2006-06-15 08:04:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by sean h 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because that is mostly what they're noted for in the past and also in the future.
2006-06-15 07:58:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the Cons' motto is "do as I say, not as I do". They are hypocrites, anti-Xtian!
2006-06-15 08:14:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kookoo Bananas 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
ummmm because liberals are tax and spend specialists. next?
2006-06-15 08:14:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋