Is US in Iraq greatest danger to global peace?

Question

check www.csmonitor.com
By Tom Regan.

Answer 1

It's the truth. Our occupation in Iraq increased the likelihood of terrorism around the world. The threat levels at home will increase greatly as well, all thanks to Bush!

Answer 2

The biggest threat to peace is if Iran or N. Korea obtain a nuclear weapon. They will not only use it on other countries but they will sell it to terrorists. If Iran got nukes they would nuke Israel which we would have to defend because they are our allies and that would pull in all of our allies to get them back. The only problem is that Iran would get nuked in response by israel which would pull in other middle eastern countries. North Korea would nuke Japan, S. Korea, and attempt to get the U.S.. South Korea and Japan have Hundreds of Thousands of U.S. troops that could possible be attacked which would cause an immediat response and we would nuke N.Korea and Russia might too. But China will have to pick a side. They sided with North Korea in the Korean war so they have a history of being against the U.S.. But having a country run by a nut with a nuke is the worst thing imaginable.

Answer 3

No the whole middle east region is a danger to global peace. While I understand there are many many wonderful people there, the bad ones know nothing but violence and they teach it to their children. There has been violence in that region for CENTURIES!!! In no other part of the world are people so blood thirsty. There are those that only know violence and many others who refuse to step up for their country. Just imagine how many terrorists and evil people would be dealt with properly if people would speak up.

Answer 4

The US in iraq is the greatest danger to the Islamo Fascists.

Answer 5

ok it truly is the precedence with that! The enemy we are dealing with is going through a bible that states a minimum of seven cases ALL INFIDELS should be DESTROYED! Muslims Koran ! those radical Muslims imagine of purely one component to kill as many infidels as available those adult males bypass threw years of mind washing wondering they're going to be reworded with virgins in the adventure that they strap a bomb to there self and blow up people. they imagine that's a honer to strap a bomb to there own little ones to do an similar !They spend all day and evening preparation to kill people . So now do you already understand how ludicrous your statement is: "there are cases at the same time as utilising a experience of intelligence overrides the adventure component.?? Do you quite imagine Obama can replace those peoples minds about attaining there objective to kill people ! Your kidding your self ! it may't be executed or perhaps with if it will be executed Obama effective as hell isn't the fellow who will be able to finish that! His intelligence is questionable because of factors like this and the purely adventure in accordance to his music record is corruption! fortunately maximum people see the threat in this way of wondering that's why Obama will lose the final election !

Answer 6

No. This conflict won't be growing into World War III or anything. It's more like Vietnam Part 2.

Answer 7

No, the greatest danger to global peace is inaction when action is needed.

Answer 8

Not at all, America is trying to "civilize" and "organize" Iraq into a diplomatic country with good economy and fair government.

Iran is a threat to the US, not Iraq.

Answer 9

not with the US backing all the undemocratic royal families... middle east has never been allowed to experience democracy thanks to American interventions... if u do not suffer from Amnesia, Saddam was the greatest ally of America's who provided him the chemical weapons to fight Iran during the 70s and the 80s

Answer 10

I think Iran having the bomb is a bigger threat, though you gotta watch out for the unpredictable North Koreans.