What would be my incentive to take on a tough job rather than an easy job? Would anyone want to work in the sewers when they could make the same money as a security guard who just needed to walk around every hour or so?
Why should the guy who comes up with a multi-million dollar idea for his company make the same as that security guard? What incentive does he even have to come up with that multimillion dollar idea?
Fixing salaries is just a stupid idea.
Besides, why would I want to take that kind of cut in pay.
2006-06-15 07:04:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ranto 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Heh-hehll no! Not only did communism fail miserably but why should those who put way more into their profession be equal to those who only did what they needed to in order to get a job. Example - do you want your brain surgeon who went to college for 15 years (yes - longer than k-12) to make the same money as the dip-wad who can't even make my egg mcmuffin have no cheese? Ok, so they both work 40 hours a week, but really, would you go to the brain surgeon who is equal to the "would you like frys with that?" guy?
2006-06-15 05:36:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by answer lady 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can we say communism. I probably would vote against it because that deletes work ethic completely realistically. Why should anyone bother moving up in the world if they are going to have the same pay and stuff? I know that is works in theory, but in reality, it is nothing but a far fetched pipe dream.
2006-06-15 05:32:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by The Shadow 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no different jobs deserve different pay.... some are just more important than others... diversity leads to a better economic system... if salary goes up demand for products goes up, therfore supply goes down, and inflation will ensue making the price of products higher, it will eventually equalize and we'll be right back where we started
2006-06-15 05:35:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
could you imagine the cost of living after that law, just like everything goes up when minimum wage is upped and people are no better or worse off than before
2006-06-15 05:31:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not possibel unless every price on everything was accordingly reduced. Or the number would have to be a LOTTTTTTT bigger! But I totally would if it could be figured out!
2006-06-15 05:32:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by CHICKENPOOP!!! 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
communisim works in theroy only unfortunitly...
so by this if I worked 80 hours a week do I get $100,000?
2006-06-15 05:33:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by hate dept 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no...i make well over that.....and work 32 hours a week.....don't like the plan you have here
2006-06-15 05:32:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
40 hours a wekk? are you crazy, when are we sposed to eat and sleep
2006-06-15 05:31:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kareem W 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
unsure, but it would definatly plug the gap between poverty and rich, possibly making things easier for all(except the rich)
2006-06-15 05:32:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by westoz 2
·
0⤊
0⤋