Not if the big bang was a "shaped" charge (i.e. resulted from the collision of two or more irregular surfacesor dimentions)
2006-06-15 05:04:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by lunatic 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is an interesting question that would be absolutely true given a couple of things. First, if we knew the exact centerof the universe (where the "explosion" occurred). Second we would have to presume that the force of the explosion is even on all sids and thus provides the exact same amount of force on all sides. If those two things were true then the statement that you made within your question would be true.
The most interesting flaw in that theory (The Big Bang) to me is that the universe is ordered nice nad neat and geometrically. Every solar system that we have observed is exactly symmetrical. That would not be caused by an immense, chaotic explosion in the center of the universe.
Another question to ask is what caused the explosion itself. Explosions require a number of things to work. If there was no matter before this massive explosion, what exploded in the first place?
2006-06-15 04:21:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Shadow 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The big bang wasn't the beginning.
0d is no dimensions, but nothing is something so static made:
1d strings that hold onto the intra universe to stop matter going into the externa universe this made the strings for shapes making up other hyper dimensions.
2d is created from the 1d lines shapes. The Kaluza Klien state created
3d atoms. The 3d atoms made up from quarks nucleons of protons, neutrons and other atoms, etc. The 4th dimension was always there.
4d is the dimension of time or spacetime continuem as named in some hypothetical theories.
The 4th dimension is the first one of the lot and holds the 3 dimensions within it, this allows dimensions to warp through time as time holds space not the other way round. Thus allowing black holes and worm holes in the current universe.
When the nucleons were created the universe was dense with matter that the big bang was created by nuclear fusion from the protium and the Deuterium and Tritium multiplicated protium Hydrogen isotopes.
Then over time matter moved in different directions for long nearly infinite time.
Thus making the universe almost a sphere but a shattered egg.
If your wondering about worm holes and black holes try wikipedia and ask an astrophysicist at NASA or email me at:
Solarentric@yahoo.com
2006-06-15 05:22:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is not enough room here, so let me summarize - no, better that you read a good explanation than my pathetic attempt to summarize - check out " A short history of nearly everything" by Bill Bryson - probably available at your public library or on sale everywhere (such as at B&N online - link below). He covers the big bang and what came after it in a very comprehensive but readable style.
BTW - Great question! A nice break from some of the drek floating around here.
2006-06-15 04:34:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by JRob 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well if it was a uniform and equal explosion but maybe it was just a blast leaveing some uncertnaty as to the disbabution of matter
2006-06-15 04:18:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by wise old,man 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Quantum theory demands there be some uncertanty in the distribution of matter. This causes the distribution to be not entirely uniform. Gravity then causes the slightly denser areas to grow denser still into galaxies, stars, planets exc.
2006-06-15 04:18:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by evil_tiger_lily 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
because no one actually knows how everything came to be, some believe the bible, others beleive the bigbang theory, which is what I"m guessing you are asking about, but here is a question for you, what created the big bang?
2006-06-15 04:58:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋