President Bush rejects talk of a withdraw from Iraq Do you agree?

Question

President Bush rejects talk of a withdraw from Iraq ' Do you agree?

Answer 1

Yes.

The debate over the reasons for being there and was it right or wrong really mean nothing now - it is done.

Now the focus should be on providing the time and opportunity for the Iraqis to form and protect some form of stable government that is satisfactory to all the factions in the country.

Can this happen? Probably not. I personally see little hope for a country where the religious leaders control the minds of the people as they do, have their own militias, and can murder the leader of a rival sect and get away with it.

Answer 2

No, and it is the public's right to know where the president stands on military issues like "Operation Iraqi Blunder". So long as military maneuvers and specific things on the military itself, the public should hear what the military is doing. And, I dont know how many times the "cut and run" and the "they cant withold a government now" has been said. Firstly, they will NEVER maintain a democratic government! For many reasons, one of which is their division in people, the Shiites for example and the Sunni, completely different people. Another reason is because, staying there for a few months or even more years is going to do absolutely nothing for Iraq. They will revert back to old times. Either instilling another dictator, or having a similar government like the rest of the dysfunctional Middle East. Iraq does not want America there, and staying there longer to not look like were" cutting and running" is ridiculous. A country's ego should not dictate military action and the deaths of American soldiers. This is not like desert storm where Saddam invaded Kuwait, this was an EXTREMELY questionable operation with very shady goals. Were overstaying our welcome. Its like a pest control guy who comes over and gets rid of the bugs, but then stays for dinner after he's done, and spends the night and so on. No matter how appreciative you are of him removing the pests, he should go home, right? And besides, we all know that Iraq did not have the "WMD"s, its a false hope that all of these pro Iraq cling to for their lives. And besides, if America was so concerned originaly for "World Peace of Nations", then they better get started in Africa. Congo, Angola, all of those war torn countries are in just as much or more distress as Iraq was. So if it actually was the presidents goal to free the people, then he should be hauling *** over to the WORLD's distress zones. And besides, how long will it take to assimilate Iraq? Never, so, I ask all the pro Iraq people, how long is enough, and how long do you all think it will actually take? and why, specifically.

Answer 3

Yes, Should the police departments let criminals know when and where they will be on duty. Should they pull out of any confrontation let the criminals go to make sure no innocents are harmed. Should fireman let buildings burn to the ground rather than take a risk of possibly getting hurt. I guess no one should ever put their life or health on the line for others. We should also pull all cars off the road because they kill more innocents than all the wars ever fought.

Answer 4

because he's awar monger hell bent on attacking as many countries as available. Plus, the longer we stay in Iraq, the more desirable straightforward people can get raped on the gas pump so his friends can get their wallet a touch fatter. the reply is straightforward, we've the most corrupt president and administration ever in the front people immediately and he does no longer care about the sturdy of the rustic, he purely cares about getting richer and petting his ego. people opt to make a stand and impeach Bush till now he receives us all killed through terrorists who he's pissing of through performing like an imperialist a****le. there is no clarification for us to nevertheless be in Iraq, hell there replaced into no clarification for us to be there in the first position, nicely except for all of teh lies used to get us there, the very incontrovertible truth that Bush exceeded over protocal and attackede besides, and the very incontrovertible truth that all of us is searching for us to pull out yet our fearless chief does no longer care about the american people or how we experience.

Answer 5

Yes, I agree. If you actually take time to look at the situation over there, do you think the new government can actually stand on it's own? If we leave now, the government will fall, and our soldiers will have given their lives for nothing. We owe it to the men who died, especially my best freind's father, to stay and finish what we started. I bet if you ask any military person if they beleive in what they are fighting for, most will tell you yes.

Answer 6

I have now learned to agree with what ever is the other end of what Bush says! So I think we should leave. NOW!

Answer 7

Absolutely ... military planning and strategy is not a matter of public discussion. Politicizing military strategy gets young men and women killed in greater numbers.

Answer 8

no we should not even be over there in the first place