Yup, give the Bush supporters, his cohorts and him a taste of their own medicine !!
Those, who say that "the US invaded Iraq because S.H. posed a threat to the US" are exceedingly DUMB & IGNORANT !!!!
The US are infamous for poking their ugly nose in, where it does not belong. And those that think only the Russians might have HAD the Manpower to overcome the US-bred killers, seem to have forgotten about China.
Yup... let's give 'em a taste of their own medicine.... to those, who say "the US invaded Iraq and killed innocent women and children, because SH posed a threat to the US", I say: "the US is an IMMINENT threat to WORLD PEACE and needs to be stopped, before their killers destroy more innocent lives".... alternatively: dig Bush and his cohorts out of their holes and throw them in prison... we have had enough blood-shed... and then let them rot in jail without a fair trial - they know what that's all about, don't they ?
2006-06-27 03:16:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by PasoFino 4
·
19⤊
1⤋
I'm living the good life living in the USA....no need for invasion. It sux we go around invading other countries....Bush is afraid of a nuclear weapons in the hands of radical countries and more so after 9/11, but it doesn't give us the right to bully the world into submission. If anyone pushes the button we're all toast...and the person most likely to push it--is Bush, so I see why the world fears us. Let's all just push "peace" and stay out of each others backyards. I'm pushing the PEACE button right now!!
2006-06-15 05:17:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by chigby 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The "regime", as you put it, will change in 2008. It's called an election. We have them here in a free society. And we are not a democracy, we are a representative republic. True democracy is mob-rule. If that's what you want, well good luck.
2006-06-15 03:32:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by rduke88 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only invasion needed in this country is for the citizens to first read their constitution. Then go to the state attorney general's office and demand that action be taken against this adminstration for the acts of treason they have committed upon the citizens. We need an independent prosecutor to investigate, take his/her evidence before the judiciary and then allow the indictements to flow. I believe we would see alot of new faces in the halls of congress, in the judiciary itself and in the excutive branch. Because today every elected official is still under oath to uphold, defend and preserve the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies both foreign and domestic. I fear the terrorists but I fear the congress, judiciary, and executive branches of this government more. Tommorow we may not have that option. Because tommorow they may have successfully overthrown our constitutional government. Duke Cunningham was jailed for accepting bribes, he should have been tried for acts of treason. Because of what he did setting up dummy corporations as defense contractors then taking that money and placing it back into the republician party. His actions were one of the reasons our children entered into Iraq without proper equipment and without enough equipment to go around. Equipment like steel reinforced Humvees to protect them from IUD's. He helped to fund the republicians so they could have the majority in the house of representatives, the senate, and the excutive branch. One party rule, no more checks and balances everyone just does as they are told for the party, line their pockets and support outrageous lifestyles all at the expense of the American Citizens.
The only invasion needed is in our government demanding that they uphold their oaths of office or face charges of treason.
2006-06-23 09:11:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by barbara o 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh my god-thank you for asking this question!
Yes, by America's standards of "military intervention for the establishment of democratic rights of the people" then we (whether it be India, China, Europe, all together or even the American militry itself) should invade the illegally elected despot now in charge and establish an interim government until undemocratic corruption can be purified from the hierarchy and the channels of voter empowerment be reopen.
GREAT QUESTION
2006-06-15 03:25:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by zephyrescent 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The fact that America doesn't attack other countries and install democracies defeats the liberal shrieking argument on this.
America attacked Iraq first and foremost because, under Hussein, Iraq represented a threat to America.
2006-06-15 03:39:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by FCabanski 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bring it on. I have a 180 grain response for you, comin' at ya' at 2200 fps.
I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, as I once swore to do at my commissioning so long ago.
2006-06-15 03:42:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Informed people know that democracy is a vile form of government where the majority can and do abuse the minority, so perhaps the question should be rephrased.
2006-06-15 03:25:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Clayton R 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think if you took somebody from the year 2000 pre bush and put them here now with wiretapping,torture,wars that dont seem to really be about anything i dont think they would even know they were in America
2006-06-15 04:40:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would donate my life for the chance to be with you, if and when we do! Just the thought of it makes me tingle, Ah the smell of dead neocons in the morning! God shall shine down his loving approval, as the only battle who's cause was just!
2006-06-15 03:29:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋