English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I reckon if both types of game were played, a "rest of the world" rugby team would seriously beat the best American football team. What do you think? By the way NO PADS allowed in either game.

2006-06-15 02:26:06 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Other - Sports

I've already stated that they would play both games.

2006-06-15 02:30:59 · update #1

7 answers

I guess that as no pads are used in rugby then the rugby players would be used to the all the knocks and hard falls, however the american footballer without his pads may find that without the pads and helmet they have greater speed. The real decider I think though would be that I suspect that the americans would probably find it difficult to remember that they can only pass the ball backwards and that a conversion is taken from level with where the ball is touched down over the goal line. So I would say the rugby team would win, especially if it comprised of several NZ All Blacks.

2006-06-15 02:42:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I reckon the rest of the world team would win both a rugby match and an American football game.

2006-06-15 02:31:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The rugby players would defo win, they're used to playing without pads but the american football players would probabily bottle challenges without pads

2006-06-15 02:32:59 · answer #3 · answered by apd2005uk 2 · 0 0

England

2006-06-17 08:13:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I suppose it depends on if they were playing American football or Rugby!

2006-06-15 02:29:56 · answer #5 · answered by ehc11 5 · 0 0

i think rugby due to the fact of no pads, the fb players may take a little beaten.

2006-06-15 03:10:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yeah!, they would beat those 'mericains booties!!!!!!!

2006-06-15 02:45:39 · answer #7 · answered by fae 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers