English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I only want people who actually respect the wrestling business to answer this, not some blind WWE mark saying, " TNA sux, Cena rulz he's the best athlete ever RVD sux".

Where do you see TNA in the future (2-3 years) ??

I belive they can take Vinnie Mac off the top of the mountain becuase while Vince McMahon is moving backwards two steps at a time trying to rehash old storylines and push useless, untalented big men.

TNA realises that to get to the top they need new, fresh ideas that appeal to the audience, and a perfect example of this is the X-Division, it shits over any cruiserweight match in the WWE, hell it shits on nearly every match in WWE in the past 4 years.

Their tag team division is really solid in my opinion, they've got their homegrown AMW, The Dudleyz, Naturals and Team Canad

So with the X-Division, A really solid tag team division, and arguably a decent heavyweight division (talks of bringing Goldberg in). I truly believe that TNA is the future of wrestling

2006-06-15 00:32:06 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

6 answers

i know that tna will be the top wrestling company in the next 2 years. they bring new talent and new storylines. people just need to give them a chance.

2006-06-15 00:40:07 · answer #1 · answered by john s 1 · 0 0

Every show that i've seen in TNA has been great. In 2 or 3 years, I don't see them taking WWE, but I do see them giving WWE a real run for their money. They should have a 2 hour show by then and still be able to give us more action less talk. TNA is getting lower TV ratings than Smackdown! at the moment, but the way things are going on Smackdown!, TNA should definitely overtake that show. As for RAW, they have no chance of taking them in such a little amount of time because RAW is pulling in a 4.0 TV rating! WOW! They just put USA at the top of the network ratings. ECW even pulled a better rating than Smackdown! in one hour. TNA will be huge, just give it a little more time than 2-3 years.

2006-06-15 01:19:56 · answer #2 · answered by Cutting Edge 4 · 0 0

TNA could be the future of wrestling wwe brought back ECW because their rankings were sliding backwards and has far as ECW 25% of their wrestlers were WWE, so this was planned because their rankings were dropping. And if they think that ECW will bring their rankings back up they might wanna write their story line a little bit better I mean come on the zombie vs the sandman what a joke, if you saw ECW'S premiere on SCI FI this week you would agree with Me.

2006-06-15 01:29:14 · answer #3 · answered by Bob 3 · 0 0

I think it all depends on if TNA survives Vince's attempt to steal some of them by offering the ECW roots that many of them came up in. If they dont get any defections then i think TNA could rise to the occation and start stealing some of the thunder. they need a big star like a Goldberg or Brock Lessnar to get some of the people who are on the fence to cross over.

2006-06-21 14:59:22 · answer #4 · answered by Mike K 2 · 0 0

wwe is going down hill. wwe's destiny is stupid john cena being champ for the subsequent 10 years. wwes matches nevertheless suck. and alot of their sturdy superstars r getting previous like triple h, hbk, ric flair (quite previous), undertaker etc... and sum of wwes sturdy wrestlers r getting held back. new ecw will nevertheless suck in the destiny and could not be like the orignal ecw. smackdown has fairly undesirable wrestlers. raws the great component in wwe (yet nevertheless isnt that sturdy). wwe will proceed to hav weird and wonderful storylines like vince mcmahon blowing up in a limo. tna has tremendous matches and tremendous wrestlers and has been getting more desirable suitable each teach and getting new wrestlers. with slightly of luck tna receives more desirable commonly used and a 2 hr timeslot. i doubt sandman, dreamer, or jericho r coming to tna besides the indisputable fact that it will be superb in the adventure that they did. im nevertheless no longer effective if rvd or sabu r coming yet i heard rvd would and when you consider that both their contracts expired theres a sturdy probability they'll plus sabu replaced into in tna awhile in the past. tna has tremendous matches like most suitable x, king of the mountain, elevation x, at their ppv's yet wwe is fairly a lot only doing established singles matches. tna will keep making new interesting matches. wwe doesnt even enable their wrestlers do strikes any "risky strikes" like 450 splashes and stuffs. wwe will suck in its destiny and tna will keep getting more desirable suitable and more desirable commonly used and convey a clean aspect to wrestling.

2016-10-30 22:37:15 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

tna is on a good road... wwe brought back ecw because of that...

2006-06-15 01:08:12 · answer #6 · answered by unpretty 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers