English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

no, only the very dumb and naive will think bush is a good president, too bad they are more half of the us

2006-06-14 22:23:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Do we all agree that Sadam was a bad evil dude? After looking at the things he did killing thousands of his own people some in really really awful ways.I'd say ah yeah.. Are the Iraqi people better off without him? When we (the U.S) were attacked on 911 it was a wake up call to all of us. The most important job being president it to protect our country the best way he can. And part of protecting us Bush felt was to strike back even do a pre-emptive strike to stop or hinder our enemy from attacking us here at home again. Every major intellegence ageny form every major country said that Saddam was working on wmd's and based on this information and the fact that he had broken every resolution he was under by the UN and thumbed his nose (or gave us the finger) when told to comply or else and only when every diplomatic effort was tried and failed did our president go to congress and ask them to vote to use force against this dictator. And by an overwhelming margin they voted to use force.Because they after seeing all the intelligence info that he did felf that was the best thing to do. So we took him out and are now helping them build a free nation. I hate war but I hate terorists and terrorism more. And by the way it was proven that Saddam was paying the families of suicide bombers 25.000 a pop. And there were terrorist camps in Iraq. So given those facts I think he did the responsible thing. Has the war run smooth and easy? no, have we made mistakes? yes. But guys and gals war is not like a tv show that has a time slot that starts and ends at a given time. We will leave when our mission is finished. It has to be done or all of our men and women who have given their lives to fight for freedom would have died in vain.

2006-06-15 01:08:24 · answer #2 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0 0

While I may or may not agree with the current administration...Do you agree that terrorism breeds terrorism...When terrorist attacked America dont you think that had allot to do with policies we have in the US today? I dont agree with allot of the policies of the current administration but I do believe that terrorist are as responsible as anyone for the attack on Iraq...Do you think America would have attacked Iraq had it not been for the attack on the WTC? I know the current administration claims the attacked searching for WMD's ...but clearly this is not the real reason and I do not believe Saadam had anything to do with the bombing of the WTC but he was an ISlamic Dictator which made him a clear target. So if you are living in a country that supports terrorism why would you ask me if I believe in the invasion of Iraq...My advice would be to change the policies of the government you live under and it will be much easier for all of us to deal with the US

2006-06-14 22:40:52 · answer #3 · answered by djmantx 7 · 0 0

No. I voted for John Kerry in the 2004 election. I never liked Bush and I still don't see what Iraq had to do with 9/11.

2006-06-14 22:24:49 · answer #4 · answered by Nicky 2 · 0 0

Many Americans, as is exemplified by the people that have already answered you by saying "No we hate him to." couldn't pull their heads out of their A$$es with both hands and a road map.

The disenssion you see in this country is brought on by the Ultra Liberal Media and its biased reporting of the war in Iraq as well as the fact that being liberal, they don't like him in the first place.

Let's see how well you would fair if we took your worst enemy and let them be your mouthpiece to the world. Everytime you have a message to put out to everyone, you have to let your sworn enemy be the on that does the talking. No matter what it is you want to say, they say it for you, in whatever way they want.

Spin is the least of the issue. Its more along the lines that the DNC and the Media Elite are in bed with one another and can't STAND the thought of American's thinking for themselves. When we think for ourselves instead of believing all their hype and BS, we actually stand up to the rest of the world and say "Stop messing with us!"

You fly a plane into a building, we invade a country.
You bomb and Embassy, we kill a dictator.
You attack us, why should you not expect the same in return?

Only the Liberal morons on this board think you can talk things out. The time for talking ended a while ago, the time for action came and the President took that action rather than form another committee of DC morons to talk it over and debate about what to have for lunch before actually getting down to the business of defending this country and its people.

If you don't like our president, move someplace else. George does a much better job than either of his opponents ever would have. Al Gore said he never heard of Ossama bin-Laden yet theres video of him at a Senate Hearing asking Oliver North all ABOUT Ossama bin-Laden. John Kerry says he's for American's, yet everything he and his wife own was being shipped over seas for the cheaper labor to make them more money.

If you want to understand why we are the way we are here, bomb another building and then we'll come see you too. Then sit back in a bunker somewhere and watch as we tear ourselves appart again by first beefing up security then letting the liberals whine and complain that its inconvenient for them until we relax enough to let you do it again.

The only thing stupid about this country is that we want to talk way to much in case we hurt someones feelings. Polictical Correctness will be our downfall.

My father once said "You can't make everyone happy"

2006-06-15 01:24:26 · answer #5 · answered by r0b_a11en 2 · 0 0

No. He has led us right into a pointless conflict with the accepted objective of controlling between the main important oil fields interior the international. He has denied the existence of international warming because of the fact it did no longer adventure his desires. Now, he's a proponent of international warming because of the fact it suits his contemporary schedule. He does no longer sign the cluster bomb non-proliferation treaty because of the fact it would harm those industries production them in this united states. He claims to be a born back Christian yet he's professional-conflict. He claims to have by no potential made a mistake in the time of his administration. purely as I voted for him because of the fact he's professional-existence, i additionally will vote for McCain because of the fact the Democrats have bought their collective soul to the daddy of lies who tells them that abortion isn't homicide, that conflict is justified and stem cellular examine isn't purely yet another occasion of the collective slaughter of unborn, yet doable lives.

2016-12-13 16:18:51 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

His approval rating is only %22. Do the math. No we dont like him either.

2006-06-14 22:28:46 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Yeah, Iran's next then Syria.

2006-06-14 22:32:24 · answer #8 · answered by .45 Peacemaker 7 · 0 0

I support it 100% I don't think he sold it very well but I also don't think he needs to.

2006-06-14 22:39:06 · answer #9 · answered by MP US Army 7 · 0 0

yes and intend to vote for candidates that will continue his great work

2006-06-14 22:39:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers