2006-06-14 21:53:26 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
NOT AT ALL.
INDIA IS FAMOUS FOR LET RIVALS THROUGH IN CRUCIAL CONDITIONS.
THEY HAD ENOUGH CHANCE TO GRAB THE WIN.
BUT,
AS USUAL THEY WASTED THOSE.
2006-06-17 21:00:18 · answer #1 · answered by A.R.RAJA 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The point is the encounters should not have been "CLOSE" against a team as weak as WI.
It menas that India is only marginally stonger than a weak team like WI when playing on foriegn soils. If it was Australia vs WI, it would not have been "CLOSE" encounters - all four would have been won landslide.
2006-06-16 02:25:51 · answer #2 · answered by dude 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry bro....but i think there's nothing called badluck.....India's bad performance in WI is only because of poor selection of team n a little bit overconfidence...
2006-06-15 01:35:16 · answer #3 · answered by Jatin K 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
poor selection of players.
when vrv singh is nothing done great in first test as per the reputation why he played second test ?
when the proven player like pathan is rested for one test why the partiality for this so called fastest bowler of india?
if at all we had bajji in place of him may be the result is possible in the both tests!!!!!!!!!!!
because when sehvag can take 5 wickets with spin why dont BAJJI????
WHAT chappel doing there by taking nonsense decisions int ests?
test playing is required lot of patience , experiance , strength and intelligence in batting and bowling.
we drew only because of bowling. if it is the 9th rank team can drew matches with us why cant others like NZ, SA,AUS,PAK Can win??????
we need experiance desperately when we travel overseas...
when we dont have the little master we should have opted for GANGULY , AGARKAR,KHAN,NEHRA ..... WHO PLAYED THERE BEFORE.give chance to them also.
2006-06-14 23:32:26 · answer #4 · answered by neernar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes this is really bad luck!!
They deserved to win, but then again they needed some luck!
2006-06-21 00:16:08 · answer #5 · answered by axe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no it is so coz india wasn't playing well.you can't blame luck for dropping catches or unable to take wickets.this is incompetency.
2006-06-16 23:05:29 · answer #6 · answered by rash 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is sheer bad luck!! But they should not give up
2006-06-14 22:06:44 · answer #7 · answered by rabi21 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, not for bad luck, surely for important catch drops
2006-06-21 06:15:53 · answer #8 · answered by Sadineni G 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yuppp !!!!!! just....plain...hardluck.
2006-06-14 22:03:24 · answer #9 · answered by talk 2 me 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋