KG. he's a passionate player and i think he is like shaq minus the body size but plus the free throw shooting. big ben is not an offensive threat. and his free throw shooting needs help, just like shaq.
2006-06-15 03:26:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by elciguy 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Kevin Garnett !! Ben Wallace is, in my opinion, a good ball player but his lack of shooting doesnot put him in the same category as kevin Garnett. However, A scorer such as Garnett going to the Lakers will instantly cause cry baby Bryant to go into a funk. With that in mind Ben Wallace may be a better fit. Ben does have the personality which would allow him to be part of the Lakers one man band.
2006-06-14 21:05:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm the most important Laker fan of all time. I promise. yet i'm also a realist and understand that's incredibly uncertain the Lakers can get carry of Kevin Garnett. Lamar Odom isn't ebough to grant, and the Lakers are too sensible to provide up Andrew Bynum. That leaves the lakers with Kwame Brown (stepped up massive previous due in the season), Luke Walton (mediocre ball participant), and Chris Mihm. i do not see a commerce occurring with a mixture of those 4 gamers (all yet Bynum). besides, why commerce Odom at the same time as he went off in the playoff series adversarial to the Suns. to assist the crew get more desirable suitable, I image Marcus Banks coming in as both a loose agent or in an illustration and commerce. he will fill in the choose at aspect preserve.
2016-10-30 22:33:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say Wallace the Lakers don't have time to deal with the Kwame Brown project, they should of went after Artest they would of made it further in the playoffs. Not only should they pursue Wallace they need to get Jason Terry also.
2006-06-14 21:08:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by askmeguru21 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not withstanding Howard's "mistake" of calling for a time out at the wrong time and also tanking 2 free throws, he would be a great and welcome addition to the Lakers. This man works his butt off at all the games,also how about being born with 2 severe bow legs,having his legs broken at the age of what? 6 months and having them reset! Bring him on!!!!
2006-06-19 05:21:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by brynt_grdn 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
both,wallace will be easier to get,but garnet is a tim duncan type big man and the only player in over 3 decades to lead the league in scoring and rebounds the same year.stinkybeard is nuts what buss wants he buy's,no one in the league can afford to out bid him with that market.
2006-06-14 21:02:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
KG. The only thing wallace has that KG doesn't is a three point shot. Kobe's got plenty of those in his arsenal.
2006-06-15 08:18:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jon 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wallace, because my Pistons are going to get Garnett, and we will get back to where we need to be!!
2006-06-14 21:02:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by stinkybeardedclams 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither of them, the last thing they need is another big superstar.
2006-06-15 00:52:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by JJuva 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
garnett
2006-06-15 09:19:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋