how can you accurately measure the ability of a student to speak English? any ideas?

Question

we want to improve the ability of our students to speak English by introducing them to a "Speak English Campaign" how then can we measure the degree of their ability to communicate in English numerically

Answer 1

Read upon the ACTL OPI (oral proficiency interview) at ACTFL's website (American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages). ACTL.org You will not be able to administer it, however, you could develop a similar assessment.
You would also have to check out the ACTFL proficiency levels and what you should expect from speech at each level.
Basicially you have a conversation with the student, listening for certain factors in his speech, such as extended discourse, expressing opinions in complicated speech, etc. etc.
A less global and easier task is to give a student a speaking task, basically a role-play situation. (Explain to me what happened last week when I was out of town. What would your ideal career be and why). Then you write a rubric based on what you are listening for. (rubistar.com can help with rubrics)
I (teacher of beginners) generally use fluency, comprehensibility, accuracy and risk-taking, and then write a four point scale from excellent to poor for each area, with a description. Therefore a 16 would be a perfect score, a 12 would be quite good, an 8 would be acceptable and a four very inadequate. After evaluating a few students, you begin to get an idea what you actually expect from each score and become quite accurate.
You could evaluate your students at the beginning of your campaign and at the end and see what their improvement is.
The only problem with speaking evaluations is that they are extremely time comsuming. If you record them, you have 1-5 minutes to listen to each student, which adds up. If you evaluate them 'live', you must make many appointments outside of the regular class time.
Good luck

Answer 2

No i don't think of it will be. actually everyone appears wise in yet otherwise. I actual do not imagine all people will be "stupid" - they might no longer be knowledgeable in a unmarried difficulty yet they are in yet another. And teachers are not the in reality smarts there are... some actually everyone appears wise at the same time as it is composed of making judgements, responding to circumstances right now, situation fixing, etc. that's amazingly offtopic, yet some thing it really is continuously bothered me is how human beings grade paintings in college. Like who're you to say a persons' paintings is amazingly reliable or quite undesirable? in assessment to a topic which includes math, there isn't any proper or incorrect at the same time as it is composed of paintings.... i don't understand how all people can positioned a grade on it, reason the grade will be in person-friendly words subjective. what's seen large paintings to at least one human being would no longer be seen large to a unique man or woman... and at the same time as it is composed of grading paintings it really is in reality in reality the instructor's opinion that concerns. Sorry for the rant lol it merely bothers me... quite reliable question although! Taurus maximum cancers moon Gemini mercury

Answer 3

I would give them a combined test. A short composition, a basic grammar test and then an oral test to check on their pronunciation and ability to answer questions spontaneously.

Good luck.

Answer 4

you would have to gives scores for certain things such as fluency pronunciation and vocabulary then take an average

Answer 5

you should give him a text to read and ask him to tell you , in his own words what the text is about.

Answer 6

give them small test