English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

All answers to this question are false, since it contains an inherent contradiction.
If something in the universe is unstoppable then by definition there can exist no unmoveable objects, and vice versa.
They are two mutually exclusive concepts.

2006-06-14 21:43:38 · answer #1 · answered by Scott R 6 · 0 0

There cannot be an unstoppable force because it would use infinite amounts of energy and the laws of (energy) conservation prohibit this.

However theoretically.....

The Immovable Object would requre an infinite amount of energy to move, and although The Unstoppable Force has infinite energy, you cant get MORE than infinity, and they would cancel each other out.

So The Immoveable Object would win by default.

On the other side

physics that since e=mc^2 that mass and energy are interchangeable. Now to have an immoveable object, the object must be made up of all mass in the universe (since if there possibly any other mass at all, any collision between the object and something else with mass would result in acceleration, due to the principle of equal and opposite reactions). So, as mass and energy are interchangeable we can surmise that as there is no other MASS in the universe other than our immoveable object, there can be no other ENERGY in the universe either. By definition an unstoppable force must be moving, and would therefore have kinetic energy. Anything without kinetic energy is not moving... therefore if an immoveable object exists, and unstoppable force cannot.

Now, we can if we wish apply this logic in reverse, to prove the hypothesis that if an unstoppable force exists in the universe, it precludes the existence of an immoveable object by the same virtues.

2006-06-15 10:06:17 · answer #2 · answered by Jax 3 · 0 0

They follow the law of action and reaction. That is the unstoppable object retraces the same path but in the different direction, but the unmovable object doesn't move. I'm sure this happens.

2006-06-15 03:34:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As per your definition the unstoppable object penetrates the unmovable object and comes out of it and continues to move.

2006-06-15 05:20:04 · answer #4 · answered by Pearlsawme 7 · 0 0

I think the unstoppable object will change it's direction of motion and continue to move. The unmovable object will remain steady , probably with some damage.

2006-06-15 03:33:49 · answer #5 · answered by organicchem 5 · 0 0

i think the unstoppable object will slow down whateve trthe thing is doing..and retain that slower pace..but wouldt stop..

and as for the unmoveable object..well there u ahve..didnt move...

2006-06-15 03:31:56 · answer #6 · answered by me.. 2 · 0 0

duh... it'll bounce of course..

seriously...

there is no such thing as an unstoppable object, all moving object has a velocity and mass

and there is no such thing as an unmovable object, all objects has mass and weight

2006-06-15 03:52:38 · answer #7 · answered by dojodomo 3 · 0 0

Obliteration of objects.

2006-06-15 03:31:17 · answer #8 · answered by dh1977 7 · 0 0

it would cause one hell of a shock wave and destroy everything in the area after that who knows it hasn't happened yet so there are no survivors to tell the tale

2006-06-15 03:34:58 · answer #9 · answered by Fire Freak 1 · 0 0

Erk...crash and burn...maybe?

I remember my brother once asked me...'what happen when you have the sharpest sword on earth,it can slice everything,and you also have a suit of very powerful armour,it can't be scratched by anything.

But wat happened when we hit the sword to the armour?

nobody knows...

2006-06-15 03:37:32 · answer #10 · answered by putera 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers