English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-14 18:15:25 · 7 answers · asked by Bonethuggg 2 in Politics & Government Government

7 answers

Bigger than ours!

2006-06-14 18:18:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Controversy:

IQ tests rely largely upon Symbolic Logic (etc.) as a means to scoring, and as Symbolic Logic is not inherently synonymous with intelligence, the question remains as to exactly what is being measured via such tests. For instance, it is feasible that someone could possess a prodigious wealth of emotional intelligence while being simultaneously unable to comprehend the significance of sequentially arranged shapes. Additionally, someone who cannot read would be at a significant disadvantage on an IQ test, though illiteracy is not indicative of unintelligence.

2006-06-14 18:38:47 · answer #2 · answered by SirCharles 6 · 0 0

No. The Republicans might decide for to forget that GW Bush truly became the final Republican president. they might additionally decide for to forget the surprising screw united statesthat he became to blame for, like attacking a sovereign united states decrease than fake pretenses, truly Iraq.

2016-12-08 09:19:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

not smart,,maybe 90 but he knows how to manipulate the system. I think bush is an evil man and it is sad that republicans were duped by him and also the Christians.

2006-06-14 18:24:30 · answer #4 · answered by jamesdeanjohnson 2 · 0 0

being a republican and from Texas, as well as starting a war that everyone hates... puts his IQ into the negatives in my book.

2006-06-14 18:22:34 · answer #5 · answered by ~*Iverson*~ 2 · 0 0

Don't you have to have a mind of your own to even have an IQ??

2006-06-14 18:19:35 · answer #6 · answered by fantasy_lady428 5 · 0 0

I said 75 my friend said mid 80's... 70 is legally retarded

2006-06-14 18:18:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers