Guantanemo, Abu Ghraib, a lot of atrocities being committed on his watch.
2006-06-14 17:34:51 · 10 answers · asked by Hillbillies are... 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
A LOT of brutal tyrants go to church on Sundays.
Spanish Inquisition?
2006-06-14 17:39:10 · update #1
Yes, he is. His administration is responsible for the war crimes of: 1. A war of aggression. 2. At times, ignoring the Geneva conventions. eg. torture of POWs, targetting civilians...
His administration has consistently blocked serious investigation of events of 9/11. Lies to justify attacking Iraq. Protection of corporate interests at the expense of the poor, domestically and internationally. Repression of independent media (ie. not corporate owned with nationalist leanings) And so on, and so on... Hippocracy of having nuclear weapons at their disposal, and threatening their use, while claiming that no other nations (especially Muslim nations) should ever have this right. Further, nations labelled as enemies are denied by the US their internationally lawful right to pursue nuclear technology for electricity production. Yes, Bush is a tyrant. His policies have led to the deaths of thousands of US soldiers, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis (many civilians), and many others. He is guilty of war crimes, and should be held accountable for his aggressive, imperialist crimes. Impeachment, international trial, jail.
2006-06-14 18:21:58 · answer #1 · answered by Chris M 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Most brutal tyrants do not attend church Sundays and give so much to charities as Bush does. I'd say he is not a tyrant at all.
2006-06-15 00:37:53 · answer #2 · answered by a_phantoms_rose 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he is just a man trying to make very difficult decisions about challenges in the world to which there are no perfect solutions. His methods have certain negatives and positives depending on the perspective of the person making their own personal judgment. If it were anyone else, in his position, the solutions might be different, however there would undoubtedly be a different set of negatives and positives which would result.
2006-06-15 00:43:21 · answer #3 · answered by sapper21B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think a tyrant would not feed his people and not let them vote or protest and in the middle of the night people would disappear and never be seen. I think our neighbor Cuba is like this and they always need cheap labor from American liberals.
2006-06-15 00:39:40 · answer #4 · answered by trailsman1961 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no cuz he is still helping people and other stuff and he's only one person he cant save everyone or thing cuz theres just too much to deal with in 4years he doing his best. give him a break he's not the enemy!!!!
2006-06-15 00:45:34 · answer #5 · answered by marieantoinnette 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can t say what I think about him......No,I am not afraid for me,just for some persons I know and love......But - you are know what I think don t have type......
2006-06-15 00:57:40 · answer #6 · answered by Danica O 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HELL NO THOSE TYRANTS ARE THE ISLAMIC FASCISTS IN THOSE PRISONS. I WISH THEY WERE ALL DEAD BECAUSE THEY DON'T MIND KILLING INNOCENT PEOPLE. NOW JUST WHO IN THE HELL DO YOU THINK THE ENEMY IS ANYWAY?
2006-06-15 00:38:42 · answer #7 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, and anyone who agrees with you or thinks he is, is a hypocrite who knows nothing
2006-06-15 00:58:37 · answer #8 · answered by crystal & benjamin 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yesssssssss
2006-06-15 00:37:24 · answer #9 · answered by ♥ Vogue ♥ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YOU BET HE IS!!!!!
2006-06-15 00:35:57 · answer #10 · answered by rocker86 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋