her talents,her role,the dialoque,her expressions add. comments
2006-06-14 17:09:01 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
She's a talented girl wasting her talent on a boring and overhyped movie. The dialogues are not her faults- shame on the screenwriters. Hopefully she'll get some better roles in the near future.
2006-06-27 03:57:56 · answer #1 · answered by What's up, doc? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I had the Da Vinci code movie on DVD monthes ago (ssshhhh!) and i personally think it was a very good movie (never read the book) I've watched it like 10 timed to try to understand it better.. It really gets you thinking about the way people glorify Jesus as if he wasn't just a real man who did great things. He didn't start doing the jesus thing until his late late 20's, and the bible never really spoke of his life before then ya know. He was just a human being why is it so hard for people to believe (or accept) the fact that he may have fallen in love, had a wife and a child at some point? Plus if you look into the background of Da Vinci he did like to paint his paintings with backwords hidden mystery, maybe he was trying to tell a story no one else wanted to believe in those days knowing one day the truth would be known!! If you enjoyed the book then i would definatley have to say rent the movie, it's interesting, and educational!
2016-03-15 04:33:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
honestly, Tom Hanks' acting was more poor than audrey's!
her role was not that good, but i say she did the part.
The Langdon role is supposed to be good but Tom Hanks wasted it.
And don't blame it on the director coz Ron Howard is a champ...
Tom just sucked in that movie...Audrey helped him crawl a bit...
She did good...
2006-06-14 18:25:32 · answer #3 · answered by elvishtattoo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I love her acting abilities. She is cute in Amelie where she is a girl searching for love and she is Womanly and sophisticated with concern for finding the truth in Da Vinci Code. Hope to see her more in Future.
I'd love to see her in more movies......
2006-06-24 09:54:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She was 'fine', the movie was just 'fine' too. I read the book so I shouldn't have seen the movie at all. A good book ALWAYS makes for, at best, a mediocre movie.
2006-06-28 07:50:19 · answer #5 · answered by veronicamarie79 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am convinced her Dad owns the movie company. She's very pretty but one lousy actress. Thank goodness I am not alone in my thinking. Her lines were stilted, she was plastic, my heart breaks for Tom Hanks, one of my favourite actors next to that??? What was Opey thinking?
2006-06-14 17:17:01 · answer #6 · answered by MillwoodsGal 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is adorable and a wonderful actress who got stuck in a badly written role. She should turn down all those "obligatory French chick" roles and demand stronger leading roles (ie: Dirty Pretty Things)
2006-06-27 15:35:09 · answer #7 · answered by bobaa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
personally i liked da movie she played a good role i waz intrigued
2006-06-27 20:55:43 · answer #8 · answered by delranian9300 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She should have dyed her hair red like in the book.
2006-06-28 16:13:18 · answer #9 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
exelent perfomance through the whole movie
2006-06-28 08:59:34 · answer #10 · answered by WednesdayRenee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋