English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean we have people here that need help, and jobs.But what the upper crust of the people here, take and take not giving enough for their own people. Now grant you there are people who really don't care what happens to them or anyone else. But why can't the ones that really need help get it from their own Gov't.

2006-06-14 16:31:48 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

7 answers

how can we be expected to TAKE CARE OF PEOPLE when we cant even learn to spell?

2006-06-14 16:44:57 · answer #1 · answered by godoompah 5 · 1 0

Why should the US government be responsible for your health and well being, why should it be left to the working tax payer to support everyone else who just so happens to be "down on their luck"? Isn't that what the private sector called Charity is for? If you really want to be pissed off at a group or organization take a look at the several thousands of charities that operate on a day-to-day basis, mainly there to help people in need taking in billions of dollars annually in the name of help, and only paying out a few million annually to those who need it. Welfare, Retirement, Health care, Charity... These are not the primary functions of the US government, nor should they even be a secondary function, that is what the free market/private sector is for. The US government is only meant to be a uniting organization of states and territories to provide a united defense against attackers on any of the US's holdings.

2006-06-14 16:43:16 · answer #2 · answered by asmul8ed 5 · 0 0

The rich get tax breaks. The working class gets nothing. Insurance rates are so high many people can't afford it. House prices and inflation have soared. Illegals and outsourcing have taken away jobs. Billions go into the war and the biggest deficit in history. No one gives a damn for the poor. This administration has ruined the country.

2006-06-14 16:37:33 · answer #3 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0 0

because then they wouldn't be rich anymore. and besides it has become so socially kool to help third world countries these days. granted the whole world could use some help. but here in the states we have babies starving also. but we also have access to vital medical care that some other countries do not have and need. there are so many so called rich people that do have hearts and do as much as they can to help those who need. as for our government well guess they would rather protect the country with wars than save the people dying in our streets! confusing it is really!

2006-06-14 16:39:17 · answer #4 · answered by SHE 4 · 0 0

The government is try to play superman. I agree with what your saying. They same goes for these charities and stuff. I also dislike all this commercials talking about supporting a child in another country or adopting in poor countries. I mean we have kids in the United States who need good homes.

2006-06-14 16:36:43 · answer #5 · answered by Simmy 5 · 0 0

More and more people are waking up to the war at home. If you like country music try Merle Haggard`s America First

2006-06-14 16:42:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

why can't they be responsible for them self's why should I or the government give them anything? I think everyone has the right to be poor, don't like being poor, get a job, work hard, save some of your money each week and soon you want be poor!!

2006-06-14 16:38:34 · answer #7 · answered by Pobept 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers