2006-06-14 15:10:55 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
what i meant by the question is that the U.S. forced their way into Iraq because they are stronger. but the right in might makes right is never right but wrong. so it would be said, might makes wrong, and it would mean the same thing.
2006-06-15 02:54:25 · update #1
Depends on your definition of right. Morally or Capitalistically?
If you mean morally, absolutely not, It seems to me Iraq is being force fed something they can't stand the taste of. Metaphorically. Thus all the rebelling.
If you mean right the same way many capitalists would, then yeah, at the end of the day, all of Iraq will be on their way to the mall to pick up the latest Collective Soul CD, on their way to McDonald's before the latest Brad Pitt film starts, wearing Nike's, with a Coke in hand.
2006-06-15 02:43:07 · answer #1 · answered by celtic_goddess222 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
The Iraq War was a very bad move. The country was better off before they came there.
2006-06-14 22:14:15 · answer #2 · answered by Tammy M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No its not right and if you would like a comparison of how that strategy has been proved wrong compare the Iraq war with the Vietnam war.
2006-06-15 15:44:46 · answer #3 · answered by Sue S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, not really. When Iraq invaded Iran would have been a better example of that, or Germany invading Poland would be even better.
2006-06-14 22:13:50 · answer #4 · answered by PuterPrsn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I think that term would better describe the regime that existed BEFORE the war.
Look up Fascism, "Walk softly and carry a big stick," Napolean and the Roman Empire.
2006-06-15 00:18:49 · answer #5 · answered by R J 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋