Does the republican congress think that our tax dollars grow on trees?

Answer 1

As a rule they threw away their claims to want "smaller government" the moment they walked in the door. Fiscal irresponsibility has been the hallmark of Congressional Republicans since Clinton left office, sadly.

Answer 2

Republicans are only interested with the deep pockets , the Capitalists whose businesses make millions a year. If the deep pockets vote Republican, they know they will be given big tax breaks. How different would Democrats be? I am sure at least they would use the tax dollars towards better education.

Answer 3

Ronald Reagan once quipped, "I'm not worried about the national debt. It's big enough to take care of itself."

When we are dealing with figures as ethereal as Billions and Trillions, I think legislators just can't fathom the numbers they are dealing with. At some point, their minds just block out the staggering sums they are dealing with.

I just wish our government could change whatever fiscal policy is required so my dollars are worth more than chump change overseas. I can't afford to go to Europe because the dollar has declined so much against their currencies.

Answer 4

... they think the debt is a limitless supply of funds that will never run out... and since we have a large GDP, they don't have to be fiscally responsible...

They make democrats look like penny pinchers...

coombs1973: how do you explain the debt which is on pace to double over Bush's and a republican dominated congress' tenure? has that ever happened under democratic leadership?

Answer 5

No, it's fiscal economic policy that increased government spending will be spent again and increase the total GDP by a "multiplier". However, many monetarists believe that this can lead to higher inflation, interest rates, etc. There's much to debate about, government spending is not always a bad thing. I mean they've got to be giving it to someone right!

Answer 6

For people who are making fun of those who claim everything is about oil. There's also this little fact:

The Alaska state constitution claims common heritage rights of ownership of oil and other minerals for the people of the state as a whole. Citizen dividend checks are distributed every year in Alaska out of the interest payments to an oil royalties deposit account called the Alaska Permanent Fund (APF) created in 1976 after oil was discovered on the North Slope. The APF is a public trust fund - a diversified stock, bond and real estate portfolio - into which are deposited the oil royalties received from the corporations which extract the oil from the lands of Alaska. The first citizen dividend check from the interest of the APF was issued in 1982 and was for $1000 per every person for everyone in Alaska who had resided in the state for at least one year. Annual citizen dividends have been issued every year since then, for a total of more than $23,000 per person.

In 2003, each of the nearly 600,000 Alaska US citizens (residents of Alaska for at least one year) received a check for $1,107 from the APF. The total amount dispersed was $663.2 million. The $25 billion investment fund's core experienced stock market losses which led to the dividend's decline this past year compared to the several previous years. The amount was $433 less, a 28 percent drop from the 2002 pay out of $1,540, and a 44 percent decrease from the all-time high of $1,964 in year 2000. The amount changes based on a five-year average of APF investment income derived from the bonds, stock dividends, real estate and other investments.

Alaska relies on oil for about 80 percent of its revenue and has no sales or income tax. Alaska state government is mandated to invest 25% of its oil revenue into the APF while the other 75% of oil royalty revenue is dispersed to other government funds to finance education, infrastructure and social services. If 100% of Alaska's oil royalties had been deposited into the APF, it is conceivable that the CD this year could have been about $4,400 or $17,600 for a family of four. But then there would have been no funds for roads, education and other public services and no funds available to run the state legislature - a libertarian dream fulfillment or a social and economic disaster, which one we will never know. If state services were to have been maintained while 100% of oil royalties were deposited in the APF, there would of course have been the need for income, sales and other taxes on wages and production.
Source(s):
http://www.earthrights.net/docs/oilrent....

Oil is just 1 of thousands of commodities, with all the thousands of commidities in your state why aren't you getting paid?

With feds resources why can't feds pay 50 times better than Alaska?

Kuwait pays this way $58,000 y no rent, utilities, phone, hospital bills
Dubia pays this way
Norway I've heard has a similar system
I hear Nigeria is working on doing this

HOW FAR WILL YOU, YOUR KIDS, AND GRANDCHILDREN GET LEFT BEHIND IN THE VERY NEAR FUTURE IF THE US DOES START A SYSTEM OF THIS KIND FOR THE US PEOPLE?

ARE WE TO BE PAUPER THIRD CLASS WORLD CITIZENS WHEN YOUR GRANDCHILDREN START TO WORK?

DO WE SLIDE FROM THE RICHEST NATION TO THE POOREST IN YOUR LIFETIME BECAUSE YOU LACK THE COURAGE, NERVE, OR BACKBONE TO TAKE ACTION NOW WHEN IT'S NEEDED?

VOTE! VOTE FOR ANYONE BUT DEMS OR REPS!
THEY ARE IN POWER THEY MUST BEAR ALL THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR MISMANAGEMENT!

Answer 7

Only if the Democrats think money grows on trees too! They are much bigger spenders - look at congressional records.

Answer 8

It is the Democrats that are responsible for the pork in the budget, by adding spacial interest to a bill needed for defense.

Answer 9

Umm nope. As a rule they are the ones wanting to cut taxes.

Answer 10

As a registed Republican, I am sorry to say - YES!