English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-14 12:57:44 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

15 answers

Are you willing to share all your stuff with everyone else? I'm not.

2006-06-14 13:00:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The emergence of a strong communist, socialist or workers party, is theorized by Dr. Weir that the U.S. only represents a fragment in the evolution of democratic institutions. The Answer rests with our differences with other democracies. For example, no Parliament, no strict party discipline, no prime minister, amongst others. We also don't have dissolution of legislative branches, no armed political parties, and we consider the courts to be an active political wing.
Communist sympathizers were weeded out of government service in the 1950's. There was and still is a stigma attached to Communist party membership in the U.S. Maybe because the whole cold war thing, or maybe because Engels and Marx encouraged a revolution to install a dictator to start a communistic state. Just doesn't work with our whole freedom of choose thing we got going.

2006-06-14 15:01:17 · answer #2 · answered by kamkurtz 3 · 0 0

After a great amount of study primarily done by Thomas Jefferson, the U.S. Constitution was drafted on Voltaire's principle of a representative democracy--a republic. In the opinion of most of the Founding Fathers, the republic governmental model was the fairest and best-functioning available, even though it had never been tried on a national scale before.

Since the Constitution was drafted on this principle, and it arguably works better than any governmental system in practice, the U.S. has remained a republic. We've never had the tyrrany problems with our leaders often associated with the other great empires, like Britain, Japan or China.

2006-06-14 13:06:19 · answer #3 · answered by bracken46 5 · 0 0

There is no such thing as communism in the truest sense. The principals of communism will not survive do to two things. Leaving out freedoms to believe in a higher being and the fact that man is greedy.

2006-06-14 13:35:42 · answer #4 · answered by toetagproductions 2 · 0 0

Because it would have gone the way of the other communist nations and be no more. Communism can't sustain itself.

2006-06-14 13:01:43 · answer #5 · answered by gcbtrading 7 · 0 0

To the people that say it has failed...LOOK at the chinese go!
Keep buying stuff at Walmart and listening to George Bush's
economic policy and we too can be happy little commies
when they call and want to collect on all the bonds that they
are buying to support our war in Iraq.

2006-06-14 13:16:22 · answer #6 · answered by Chuck P 3 · 0 0

good ******* question!why is'nt the whole world communists,where have all the red parties gone,what happened to all the Ches and Fidels of the world?Communism could work if people were'nt so greedy,and if we kept the basic principles of it and just adjusted it to fit our time.
Here's an even better question...what the **** is going on with your screen name?

2006-06-14 13:04:02 · answer #7 · answered by kashious 3 · 1 0

Communism is the perfect system but ppl are too greedy and selfish, which is its downfall. And under Bush it is not communism but a dictatorship, with numerous vacations.

2006-06-14 15:22:10 · answer #8 · answered by quinniekins 1 · 0 0

Let Freedom ring

2006-06-14 13:34:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The democrats are working on it. We are about 75% there.

2006-06-14 19:14:14 · answer #10 · answered by iamright_always 1 · 0 0

Because communism is only an ideal which is practically impossible.

2006-06-14 13:03:24 · answer #11 · answered by John M 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers