If so many of you out there insist we invaded Iraq for oil, why did Bush chose the 16th largest oil producer in the world? There are 14 better ones (excluding ourselves. yes, we produce more oil at home than Iraq ever did) out there that could have been overthrown far more easily.
Furthermore, what are you going to say when Bush retires and doesn't go home to Crawford to swim in an oil-filled pool?
Just once I'd like to see real evidence come with the claim,
"We did it for oil."
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/rankorder/2173rank.html
2006-06-14
12:02:14
·
7 answers
·
asked by
obviously_you'renotagolfer
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Also, if we did it for the oil, how do you explain this? Counterintuitive, no?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/oil/story/0,11319,777784,00.html
2006-06-14
12:06:02 ·
update #1