A) In an effort to work with democrats, he signed Ted Kennedy's education bill and has spent more on public education than any President in history.
B) In another effort to appease the Democrats, Bush has increased social security spending more than any President in history.
C) The Bush administration has not allowed an attack on US soil since 9/11.
D) Clinton initially started Echelon, the eavesdropping program by the US government, so why does Bush think he gets to use it too.
E) Bush's marines MAY have killed 24 Iraqi civilians which is much worse than the 300,000 Iraqi civilians Clinton allowed Saddam to kill.
F) Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Act in 1998 requesting the removal of Saddam and the installation and support of a "US friendly" government but Clinton didn't get any of the oil action.
G) Who needs facts - I get my talking points from the DNC and they tell me I need to be upset.
2006-06-14
09:37:10
·
20 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
OH sorry, I forgot. Liberals go ahead and spew your hate. It just let's everyone know you have no capacity for understanding the issues addressed above.
2006-06-14
09:48:53 ·
update #1
EBWINA -- nice to see you are a registered MoveOn.org supporter, how much is a monthly subscription? I'm tired of thinking for myself, I want my propaganda and slogans spoon fed to me as well.
As a Bush supporter (A) drives me the craziest. The fact that the President would sully is hands on anything that Kennedy already stained with his own paw-prints is disgusting. Democrats have shown, during the last 40 years, that they know NOTHING of education or how to run a school system. Kennedy's bill will continue the series of failures.
2006-06-14 11:29:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
F) Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Act in 1998 requesting the removal of Saddam and the installation and support of a "US friendly" government but Clinton didn't get any of the oil action.
Oil action I love the high gas prices and they have only increased since Bush the oil man too over. They will not go down any time soon.They try to say the oil is getting low but there is no true facts for how much oil is in the ground all over the world. Instead the government pays people in the United States to keep a cap on their own oil wells. We not only do that but also in Mexico.
2006-06-14 16:50:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Layla 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
E) Bush's marines MAY have killed 24 Iraqi civilians which is much worse than the 300,000 Iraqi civilians Clinton allowed Saddam to kill.
This talking point I do not understand. When was Bill Clinton ever in charge of Saddam Hussein? Did Saddam ask Bill if he was allowed to kill his own people and Bill said yes?
2006-06-14 17:17:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
While I doubt you are looking for anything other then heated responses plus some hoorahs from people who may agree with you, I will give you my reason for being upset with George Bush.
George Bush has borrow 1.05 Trillion to fund his wars in Iraq and Afghanistan along with liberal social spending between 2000 and 2006.
Presidents Washington through Clinton have borrow 1.01 Trillion in foreign aid.
That means that George Bush has racked up more national debt in six years then all other presidents COMBINED. He has the most irresponsible spending agenda of any president, ever. Which is probably why we are in the largest deficit in this nation's history.
2006-06-14 16:45:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by collegedebt 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The most frustating thing about the Bush presidency is his committing the country to the lunacy of his Iraq policy, then once the recognition sets in we get, "Well, what would you do now regardless of how it all began". We need a change in policy, not just throwing more and more effort down this rathole.
2006-06-14 16:49:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Donald 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is all a matter of perspective and opinion. I choose H) He is a Republican. Anyone who is Democrat automatically hates him (supposedly). It kind of makes me ashamed to be a Democrat. You shouldn't take your points from the DNC. I don't I make my decisions on my own. I don't let anyone tell my that I need to be upset about anything. No, I didn't vote for Bush, but I have not been harmed by his administration, either.
2006-06-14 16:43:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by zharantan 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
We, liberals, don't care about the person in office, we care more about how and if that person is making a concise effort to make things better for our nation. We, liberals, are for the people and we hold true to that. We, liberals, will not be treated unfairly. So it's not Bush the person, it's Bush the bad decision maker that has me pissed off.
2006-06-14 17:07:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by L.A.G 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lets go as@hole. First off Bush has cut spending in no child left behind. Which I am sure if you ask your hermaphrodite child, they might be able to tell you that. Second You have no FACTS to back any of this shi t up, just like always all talk no fact.
2006-06-14 16:54:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by se_roddy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'll take H. The fact that he lies. That fact that he has drove our country into a major debt which is hurting all of us. The fact that he is bed with the enemy.
I'm bored with this topic and you, so I'll stop now because I'm sure you get the point!
2006-06-14 16:46:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by abrinaus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I had to think for a minute if I wanted to report you, but decided not to , you are Constitutionally entitled to you free speech; but be prepared for further ridicule (or possible support) on here.
2006-06-14 16:43:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋