English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

30 answers

no. there is only one agenda. We vote on who gets to be the face of it.

2006-06-14 09:08:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Obama is a sturdy speaker with a teleprompter and a speech author. besides the indisputable fact that, the disastrous results of lower than 2 years of his presidency and only about 4 years of liberal administration of Congress bear repeating. 5 trillion more desirable in nationwide debt. Quadrupling of the deficit. Failed stimulus equipment that fee a million trillion, pushed unemployment as a lot as ten%, and has executed no longer some thing we were promised it would do. A curler coaster economic gadget that bounces up and down by way of inept, moronic, monetary guidelines of a liberal administration no longer as a lot because the interest. Uncertainty in the marketplace that's turning out to be and retaining an unemployment disaster. All of this with out even stating one hundred of campaign provides you damaged or exceeded over and the numerous lies this "guy" has informed. i imagine in gentle of all of this that the nature of the candidate is only as considerable as what he says or how he promises a speech. u . s . a . replaced into stupid adequate to decide on someone they knew no longer some thing about and now maximum of them are unhappy with what they were given (approval rankings in the low 40s for three hundred and sixty 5 days). If some thing we choose more desirable get top of entry to to the lives of applicants. Their impacts, their heroes, their position fashions, their faith, their beliefs, their mentors, their training, even their wellbeing. The more desirable all of us study about the fellow the more desirable suitable knowledgeable our determination will be in the balloting revenues area. that is the considerable clarification why Obama's persevered suppression of information about his previous is fairly disappointing and leads such diverse to trust that their aren't to any extent further honorable motives in the back of it.

2016-10-30 21:48:33 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes for 2 reasons, 1 example the last presidential election, george bush v/s john kerry. george is a great leader, but public speaker, not good. john kerry is a good public speaker, but our country would be a shithole if he was the prez today. Please Do Not Elect An Idiot Into Office In 2008 Ppl

2006-06-14 09:12:17 · answer #3 · answered by Nicole 4 · 0 0

yes, definently!!! the last election, Kerry vs. Bush. people i knew wanted Bush because Kerry would allow gay marriges, and lots of other stuff, but im not into politics, and thats all i heard. but anyway, Bush ended up winning, now everyone hates him because of other verious things. yes, it soo totally matteres who is the president, and if i ever run, i have some mojor renevations for the world, and i think that i could really help people. thank you.

2006-06-14 09:13:20 · answer #4 · answered by yamsie love 1 · 0 0

Yes. It determines who will basically rule over us. Who will make the laws, get us into/out of war, get us out of debt or into more debt. It really does matter who we vote for president. The question really should be is, How do they determine who is going to run for President and why can't an average joe blow run for it?

2006-06-14 09:11:52 · answer #5 · answered by jasmine 2 · 0 0

YOU DAMN RIGHT I DO! Heck, if none of you or others with you mindset care, then I'll run for president. But you complain about how I do my job, tough sh**. If you don't vote, you have no right to b**** because you didn't pick a side in the election.

2006-06-14 09:16:12 · answer #6 · answered by Andrew R 2 · 0 0

Yes, absolutely. I just wish our vote counted for something. The Electoral College stole the popular vote from the people in 2000.

2006-06-14 09:09:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes it certainly does...however is the one that the people truly elect the one that GOES to the White House?

2006-06-14 13:15:40 · answer #8 · answered by Seagoat 2 · 0 0

well lets compare clinton lied about getting a piece of tail in the oval office and no body died. Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction and over 2500 soldier,fathers sons and husbands are dead and over 18000 wounded,missing arms,legs etc. So what do you think?

2006-06-14 09:11:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

hell to the nawww!!! You know why because the elite choose whom they wish to run the countries!! Presidents aren't elected they, are selected!!!!! If they are a threat to the "elite's" agenda, then its curtains!!! Kennedey, Lincoln and who ever else!!

2006-06-14 09:14:36 · answer #10 · answered by The King 6 · 0 0

Yes, it does matter to the ones who care. The ones who have lost hope for politics usually shrug their shoulders and say to hell with it all. Tsk, tsk.

2006-06-14 09:21:53 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers