2006-06-14 08:52:39 · 11 answers · asked by hewyacehole 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
because sex is expensive....are you on the dating scene? My credit card bills are exploding like a plane hitting a skyscraper
yeah that was in bad taste...but what do you expect for a pointless rhetorical question
2006-06-14 08:56:20 · answer #1 · answered by smartmitch 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm no longer effective precisely what you mean through "spending on 911." Do you mean spending on investigating what got here about that day? Do you mean the cleanup prices? Do you mean the improvements to nationwide protection or the fee of top the following protection pressure action in Afghanistan? both way, the quantity of money spent to look at bill Clinton's wrongdoings is fairly outrageous. at the same time as the habit of the President is extreme corporation, there should be a line drawn someplace defining what's and isn't any longer a useful era of attempt and time spent thinking the different issues dealing with u . s . a . at present.
2016-10-30 21:47:20 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
investigate the wtc? probably cause sex is more fun, besides clinton had better lawyers and its pretty obvious what happened with the wtc.
2006-06-14 08:55:46 · answer #3 · answered by thale138 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
FOR THE SAME REASONS WE GIVE the bad guys...
a hair cut... see a dentest.... get a new suit... pluss cable tv.... and 3 squares a day... and a lawyer
their not even US citizens (WELL i guess bill is)
that is somthing most americans dont have... make sure when you break the law its a federal crime!
sombody is missing somthing...
2006-06-14 08:58:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only logical conclusion is that because Republican politicians are idiots and the people who vote for these idiots do not mind having their taxes used for such foolish investigations.
2006-06-14 09:01:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nobody tried to lie and cover up the WTC.
2006-06-14 08:56:14 · answer #6 · answered by tex 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
look at it this way: what ever the media doesn't cover extensively, then for anything else that *really matters* you can just forget about. nevermind the 'man behind the curtain' pulling strings and making money...
2006-06-14 09:09:59 · answer #7 · answered by neutrogyn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kenneth Starr is a conservative sensationalist who had stock in the porn industry
2006-06-14 08:57:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Priorities. Republicans make a lot of sense don't they?
2006-06-14 08:57:13 · answer #9 · answered by sassyk 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bush,covering up the money bin landen lent him
2006-06-14 08:56:20 · answer #10 · answered by lbestbc 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋