NOTE: Just because something seems unanswerable doesn't mean we just jump on the "God did it" bandwagon. God may have well caused something, but until we can scientifically prove there is a god, which we cannot, God is simply a band-aid on an unresolved question.
Look into M-Theory. Also known as Membrane Theory. It says that our universe is much like a membrane in a sea of other membranes. Each one is called a "brane". Each one, has a different set of physical laws. There are an infinite number of these branes, therefore, an infinite number of universes, and thus, an infinite number of intelligent civilizations. Thus, Hitler won world war II, the dinosaurs never died out, and you were never born. Those are alternate universes.
This can also include the thought of time travel. If you were to change history, such as, if you went back in time, and save Abraham Lincoln's life, you would in essence be creating an alternate universe. Lincoln would still have been killed in our universe. But in this alternate universe, he'd be alive. Essentially, you wouldn't have changed history at all.
As for the cause of the Big Bang, the general hypothesis is that two branes collided, causing the Big Bang, and the creation of a separate new brane; a universe.
A question to be asked: Why are the laws of our universe the way they are? For now...God
God could be at the helm of a reality of infinite universes. Infinite possibilities of which we cannot fathom with our finite minds. Perhaps there is a divine overseer.
2006-06-14 10:16:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by trancevanbuuren 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, funny enough thats what i am asking myself .........in-part.
It would seem that the biggest problem is a singularity. To create a new universe within a universe could be possible if we believe there is anything after a singularity. This is part of the process of a star breaking down and basically imploding, absorbing all mass around it (including light) into a singularity. A black hole will form which under certain conditions will cause a singularity. It could be thought that this is the beginning of the recreation process. One of the results maybe a Genesis of a new universe, a twist in the time space fabric of our universe to create another. some believe that our universe is like a balloon and a new universe within ours would look like a twist in that balloon, forming a new expanding pocket of space. They also believe that it would exist with all basic laws of physics and time as we understand them, changed.
The existance of infinity is questionable. Scientists now believe that the mass and therefore the size and energy of our universe are finite. Interestingly that would imply that time is finite too. The idea that our universe is 20 billion light years across? Rubbish! it's expanding so fast that a meaningful fixed diameter for the universe is impossible it can only be quoted as a degradting rate of expansion.
I like one part of what you said that would make sense off the top of my head. The matrix idea... hmm.... Imagine the universe as a multi-dimensioned matrix that can only have solutions for the position of the eye of the perceiver of the matrix or as a component within it. Lets say you can travel in time and space and act as a component in the matrix. In each position you will find different solutions. The same object will look different as you move around the matrix as a result of many effects of the data and operators within the matrix and as a result of your interaction as a viewer. Then we could say that each perciever would see different solutions within the matrix.
This would be an interesting concept for a multi-universal scenario.
My interest right now is in time.
I really want to know if "Time" = 0 or its effect can be a real observable event within out universe. If Time can = 0 then it could be likely that time can become negative.
2006-06-17 19:39:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by jonstarjon 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
In cosmology, there are numerous very distinct measures of distance. One degree is how lengthy it took for the gentle we see to get the following expanded through the speed of light. We see 5 billion three hundred and sixty 5 days previous gentle from a galaxy which replaced into 3 billion gentle years (angular distance) away at the same time as it emitted the gentle. We typically say that galaxy is 5 billion gentle years away. yet, because the gentle left that galaxy, the enlargement of area has moved the galaxy to a distance of possibly 10 billion gentle years away (wild wager). So gentle emitted from that similar source at present would take one hundred billion years to achieve the following. The CMB glow is meant to be about 13.4 billion years previous (relationship from the time at the same time as the universe first grew to develop into clear, about 380,000 years after the great bang). It replaced into emitted through aspects which at the on the spot are about seventy 8 billion gentle years away. in case you double that, you get 156 billion gentle years. besides the indisputable fact that, in accordance to considerable bang theory, the diameter of the universe is an similar as its radius. that is because gravity warps the area turning the gentle in closed area-time loops. If that is real, then the diameter should be seventy 8 billion, no longer 156 billion. speaking as man or woman who would not count number on massive bang, i'd propose you to be incredibly skeptical of all those distance measures, yet do attempt to comprehend what's meant through them.
2016-10-30 21:45:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dutch dolls look nothing like onions!
I think you're mistaking them for the Russian Matroeshka dolls.
2006-06-15 05:28:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i have thought about this myself and it is kinda overwhelming when you think of the pure infinity of our galaxy, milky way, and then multiply that infinity by millions of times only to make up a section of our universe which (probably) in turn is absolutely miniscule in comparison with what is beyond our universe. it just goes to show the infinty of our universe and beyond. Amazing, eh!!!!!!!
2006-06-14 08:45:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
its like chasing a rainbow end.it seems to come to earth.when all it really does is curl around it.i dont think of such things.plain and smiply because no one has the answers only theories.and theories dont cut it for me.its got to be black and white.
2006-06-14 19:11:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by confucius 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
its posible. youll get alot of religious answers on this one. this is sort of like my ufo theory about how we are advancing in travel and there are other plants farther along in travel than we are that we havnt been able to reach yet but they can reach us because they are more advanced
2006-06-14 08:42:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by rodie5582 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it's possible but without some more theory there is no way around the horizon distance
2006-06-14 08:53:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by mesun1408 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
you may be right. and that's what the scientific world is looking for a proof.
2006-06-14 08:47:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by kuttan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋