i'm neither, but i would be inclined to say it's due to the health risks presented, and the ability to regulate the porn industry.
how would the state or federal government regulate prostitution when most prostitutes don't work in a brothel?
2006-06-14 07:58:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by steve w 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
In the words of George Carlin, "Selling is legal. F*cking is legal. Why isn't selling f*cking legal? In the army they give you a medal for dropping nepalm on people in civillian life you goto jail for giving someone an orgasm."
2006-06-14 07:56:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joker 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wanna say it has something to do with the fact that porn stars have health checks, and REPORT their income, and have other legal related (legal goes mostly to the studio though) obligations to fulfill....and I also heard that porn stars don't really "like" what they do, so that qualifies as a real job, but then again, I just "heard" that somewhere....
2006-06-14 07:57:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A HOOKER IS NOT ILLEGAL ON CERTAIN STATES AND COUNTRIES. AND THE REASON IT IS ILLEGAL IS BECAUSE PORNSTARS PAY TAXES AND HOOKERS DONT!
2006-06-14 08:02:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by lovalova_22 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pornstars can choose who they want to work with.
Hookers takes everyone who approaches them.
2006-06-14 07:59:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Not_Here 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
THATS A GOOD ? I THINK A PORNSTAR HAS TO BE TESTED FOR STD'S AND ACCOUNT FOR THEIR PAY AND HOOKERS DON'T. SOUND STUPID HUH WHO KNOW'S WHY THE WORLD WORKS THIS WAY
2006-06-14 07:57:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by SABRINA S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I been wondering about that one too. Sorry I can't answer your question.
2006-06-14 07:56:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by hpotter4ever2000 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think cause a pornstar is on a contract and a hooker isnt, idk
2006-06-14 07:56:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋