Who do you like more Nadal or Federer?

Question

Who do you like more Nadal or Federer?

Answer 1

Federer, he is amazing to watch almost one of the best players of all time except when he is matched against nadal

Answer 2

Federer. As a long time Sampras fan, I see Federer becoming the best who has ever lived. Whenever Nadal and Federer play on clay, I root for Nadal because his clay game is amazing, but Nadal, as good as he is on clay, is a 1 trick pony. He may win some hard court tourneys but I don't see him ever winning the US Open. The Australian benefits him due to the climate because he's such a fighter, but he'll never do anything on grass.

Federere dominates all surfaces and will eventually win 1 -2 French Open's. The only people who have small chances of beating him at Wimbledon are Safin, Nalbandian, and (long shot) Roddick.

Answer 3

Federer is the #1 player because of his all rd game, variety of amazing shots,wraps up matches mostly in 3 sets. His 4 losses 've been against Nadal (3 on clay,1on hard) but a deficit of 3000 points distinguishes Nadal from Federer. Roger has manged to win all other slams.

Answer 4

Federer is a more versatile player than Nadal. Both men would break records when they win the French Open Finals. Nadal is a clay surface master that's why he won. But Federer is better playing in grass and in hard surfaces

Answer 5

I like Federer 500 times better than Nadal. Nadal may be good on clay, but he is not too good on everything else. I can bet you everything in my room that Nadal doesn't get to the quarterfinals of the U.S Open or Wimbledon. Federer will probably win both and show Nadal that winning on clay isn't everything.

Answer 6

Federer

Answer 7

I like Nadal better because Federer will never be as good as Nadal is on clay!

Answer 8

Nadal's good. He's a pretty colorful personality and he's excellent on clay, but I prefer Federer by a long way. His game is far better to watch. So much more dynamic, with way more shot variety. He's also more an all-surface player. Clay-court tennis gets a little boring after a while.

Answer 9

Actually both!

But after what Nadal has done in Roland Garross 2006!

I can't say a thing!

I like Federrer's Style of playing, cause he's so cool and not tensed,

While on the other hand Nadal is amazing in getting the Ball right into the court without letting Federrer to touch it!

Answer 10

Federer, Nadal's too stuck up. Federer is unbeatable on anything but clay, really. That is what makes him such a good player. He can win on almost any surface while Nadal's game is really just on clay.