2006-06-14 06:18:53 · 34 answers · asked by icandomagic23 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Absolutely. As for the "robbing" the elections, the Supreme Court (A liberal Supreme Court) stopped the counting because it was getting ridiculous.
And there was a record number of voters who turned out in '04 (Democrat and Republican) so he surely didn't "steal" that one.
BTW, Heather W great read...very nice
2006-06-14 06:26:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
While I'm no fan of President Bush, I do respect the office.
I believe he has tried to do what he feels are best for this country.
Yet, nearly every thing he has done, I have found fault with.
No need to expound and I am not trying to change anyone's opinion of him.
However, it is regrettable that there are those supporters who castigate ANYONE who disagrees with the president.
Hmmm...and I thought I was living in America, not some dictatorship where you worship the god they tell you to!
Anyway - there are no legal grounds in which to remove him...at least not yet.
He still has a few more months in which some impeachable evidence might turn up.
It wouldn't be the first time for a sitting president.
Still, I wish him no ill-will.
If anything, I pray that God will hurry and give this man a working brain and a compassionate heart.
He really, really needs those things!
2006-06-14 06:47:47 · answer #2 · answered by docscholl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes - even though I'm AGAINST Bush?
Despite how crafty and unethical he is, everything he has done (that we know of) is in the framework of the law, even if just barely so. He knows his loopholes.
Meanwhile, who put him in office? Did you vote? People can blame the leader all day. People in this day and age don't take an interest in politics like they used to. Does that mean they created a perfect world? Of course not! A lot of things did change when people were active - when they got off their butt.
Who gets in office is the responsibility of the voters.
2006-06-14 06:28:33 · answer #3 · answered by alittledifferant 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush never should have been in office. THe republicans stole the election both times. Only a retard like bush would vote for bush.
2006-06-14 06:22:08 · answer #4 · answered by tezken1 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good lord, Heather W. is fullll of herself.
Anyway, though Heather W. embarrasses me immensely, Bush has done nothing against the law, so yes, he still belongs in office.
2006-06-14 06:48:18 · answer #5 · answered by Spencer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shouldn't have been there in the first place.
2006-06-14 06:21:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No more terrorists attacks in this country since 9-11. Yet you morons still want to get rid of him. You have got to be a product of government schools.
2006-06-14 06:25:57 · answer #7 · answered by vhart 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-06-14 06:22:11 · answer #8 · answered by Mister Bob the Tomato 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Apparantly so, because nobody has impeached him. Even if we don't like him, he has a right to finish his term and then we can vote some other rich idiot into office and talk about him behind his back.
2006-06-14 06:24:09 · answer #9 · answered by ... 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he should be in court in the Hague defending himself against the charges of crimes against humanity, his Vice President and his Secretary of State should be standing beside him. As this war goes on and more atrocity's become known maybe he will be before it is over.
2006-06-14 06:24:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋